Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Can one increase the effective mass of tonearm? - Misael 04:43:36 08/12/06 (19)

• Could it be something else? - paul_s 10:45:16 08/13/06 (0)
• 11Hz should not a problem, yes I read the posts below. - Garth 07:45:59 08/12/06 (10)
• Re: 11Hz should not a problem, yes I read the posts below. - Misael 09:12:38 08/12/06 (9)
• Sorry, you lost me. I have NO idea what you are talking about. (-: (nt) - Garth 09:38:38 08/12/06 (0)
• 14Hz it is very close to a low violin tone??? - HenryH 09:18:06 08/12/06 (7)
• Re: 14Hz it is very close to a low violin tone??? - John Elison 09:27:32 08/12/06 (6)
• The lowest natural instrument frequency I know of is.... - tubesforever 10:35:39 08/12/06 (0)
• Thanks, John. That's what I thought. /nt\ - HenryH 09:37:33 08/12/06 (4)
• Ooops...my mistake it should be low organ tone.(nt) - Misael 09:45:19 08/12/06 (3)
• That is right! 19hz from my experience. - tubesforever 10:38:53 08/12/06 (2)
• The "brick wall" is 22KHz, not 20 hz (nt) - MAS 20:06:26 08/12/06 (1)
• 22kHz is the Nyquist frequency not the brickwall filter frequency ... - Garth 01:20:40 08/13/06 (1)
• Yes, any mass you add at the headshell increases total effective mass by at least that amount. (nt) - John Elison 07:19:23 08/12/06 (0)
• Re: Can one increase the effective mass of tonearm? - pt109 05:12:18 08/12/06 (0)
• Hmmm. With the figures you give, Ed's Cart dB gives a - HenryH 05:01:16 08/12/06 (4)
• My experience is similar - DKG 12:08:04 08/12/06 (2)
• Re: My experience is similar - Misael 20:38:36 08/12/06 (0)
• Your listening experiences indicate the RF is too low not too high. - Garth 13:37:26 08/12/06 (0)
• Re: Hmmm. With the figures you give, Ed's Cart dB gives a - Misael 06:07:26 08/12/06 (0)

Follow Ups

• Sorry, you lost me. I have NO idea what you are talking about. (-: (nt) - Garth 09:38:38 08/12/06 (0)