Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - MM vs MC (not Spy vs Spy) - tlea 23:41:55 08/05/05 (32)

• How come my 103R sounds brighter when (transformer) loaded to 3 Ohms? /nt/ - Jeff Maxson 11:00:47 08/06/05 (14)
• 3 Ohms? Are you sure? - garth 11:17:56 08/06/05 (12)
• Re: 3 Ohms? Are you sure? - Jeff Maxson 11:55:49 08/06/05 (5)
• You mean "brighter" in a positive sense? - garth 12:42:39 08/06/05 (4)
• Well, it isn't overbearingly bright... - Jeff Maxson 15:17:47 08/06/05 (3)
• What would Beethoven say? - tubesforever 01:06:33 08/07/05 (2)
• Yes, I play the saxaphone - garth 10:13:45 08/07/05 (1)
• Beethoven died death, and I will die dumb! - tubesforever 15:03:57 08/07/05 (0)
• Garth, you really need to learn something before spouting all this erroneous bullshit.... - John Elison 11:44:54 08/06/05 (5)
• resistant to reluctance in magnetic flux influence - tubesforever 00:40:48 08/07/05 (0)
• John, you really need to learn something before spouting all this erroneous bullshit.... - garth 11:58:00 08/06/05 (3)
• Zero Ohms is a Dead Short. - tubesforever 00:47:22 08/07/05 (0)
• I'm sorry Garth. I didn't realize you knew so much. (nt) - John Elison 12:03:24 08/06/05 (1)
• Sorry, reactance not reluctance. - garth 12:08:22 08/06/05 (0)
• Beats me! How come? (nt) - John Elison 11:06:28 08/06/05 (0)
• Re: MM vs MC (not Spy vs Spy) - Doug Deacon 08:56:43 08/06/05 (1)
• Very helpful, thanks (nt) - tlea 09:03:45 08/06/05 (0)
• My experience has been... - Skylab 07:24:01 08/06/05 (0)
• Re: MM vs MC (not Spy vs Spy) - John Elison 06:28:01 08/06/05 (1)
• Set the loading for the best sound! Right On John! - tubesforever 00:59:41 08/07/05 (0)
• Re: MM vs MC (not Spy vs Spy) - tubesforever 00:34:07 08/06/05 (11)
• Re: MM vs MC (theory vs practice) - tlea 07:28:17 08/06/05 (10)
• Here and There and Back Again - tubesforever 11:57:25 08/06/05 (9)
• Strictly incomplete empirical data - garth 09:13:19 08/07/05 (1)
• Re: Strictly incomplete empirical data - tubesforever 15:11:14 08/07/05 (0)
• 295.42 ohms - tlea 12:19:21 08/06/05 (6)
• it's actually 293.55 ohms - garth 12:36:24 08/06/05 (5)
• Absolutely right, about resistor values vs label values - tubesforever 00:56:39 08/07/05 (1)
• Re: Absolutely right, about resistor values vs label values - garth 09:30:48 08/07/05 (0)
• It looks like you need a new calculator. :) (nt) - John Elison 13:54:30 08/06/05 (2)
• you may be right ...for once. - garth 18:53:38 08/06/05 (1)
• Actually, I got 293.57 rather than 293.55. :) - John Elison 20:09:35 08/06/05 (1)

Follow Ups

• How come my 103R sounds brighter when (transformer) loaded to 3 Ohms? /nt/ - Jeff Maxson 11:00:47 08/06/05 (14)
• 3 Ohms? Are you sure? - garth 11:17:56 08/06/05 (12)
• Re: 3 Ohms? Are you sure? - Jeff Maxson 11:55:49 08/06/05 (5)
• You mean "brighter" in a positive sense? - garth 12:42:39 08/06/05 (4)
• Well, it isn't overbearingly bright... - Jeff Maxson 15:17:47 08/06/05 (3)
• What would Beethoven say? - tubesforever 01:06:33 08/07/05 (2)
• Yes, I play the saxaphone - garth 10:13:45 08/07/05 (1)
• Beethoven died death, and I will die dumb! - tubesforever 15:03:57 08/07/05 (0)
• Garth, you really need to learn something before spouting all this erroneous bullshit.... - John Elison 11:44:54 08/06/05 (5)
• resistant to reluctance in magnetic flux influence - tubesforever 00:40:48 08/07/05 (0)
• John, you really need to learn something before spouting all this erroneous bullshit.... - garth 11:58:00 08/06/05 (3)
• Zero Ohms is a Dead Short. - tubesforever 00:47:22 08/07/05 (0)
• I'm sorry Garth. I didn't realize you knew so much. (nt) - John Elison 12:03:24 08/06/05 (1)
• Sorry, reactance not reluctance. - garth 12:08:22 08/06/05 (0)
• Beats me! How come? (nt) - John Elison 11:06:28 08/06/05 (0)