RE: RCM specs and features

Posted by Goober58 (A) on October 16, 2023 at 18:35:17

In Reply to: RE: RCM specs and features posted by Sondek on October 16, 2023 at 13:03:47:

I had the 16.5 and the 17. I thought the 17 was a better machine and worth the money (the 16.5 was worth it too). IMO it cleaned twice as well. I don't know if it was the reverse or the stronger suction or something else. I just didn't like using them or having them around. If I need to deep clean a record I can do well enough without a RCM - problem is most records that sound like they need a deep clean are damaged. Magically my vinyl playback is not so susceptible to surface noise. Thank you Dynavector.

If I ever sell my records it'll be worth getting a record cleaning machine.

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - RCM specs and features - posaune32foot@gmail.com 11:06:59 10/16/23 (12)

RE: RCM specs and features - Yeti42 16:20:00 10/30/23 (0)

Price and replacement parts - tketcham 05:23:22 10/21/23 (1)

RE: Price and replacement parts - Tre' 16:30:41 10/22/23 (0)

Longevity - E-Stat 10:27:38 10/17/23 (2)

RE: Longevity...-yup - Steve Parry 15:23:21 10/18/23 (0)

Yep, my VPI is 36 years old and it still sucks. //nt - MaxwellP 11:13:09 10/18/23 (0)

RE: RCM specs and features - Sondek 13:03:47 10/16/23 (3)

RE: RCM specs and features - beach cruiser 20:40:49 10/17/23 (1)

Wow! - Lew 13:57:53 10/30/23 (0)

RE: RCM specs and features - Goober58 18:35:17 10/16/23 (0)

RE: RCM specs and features - 6bq5 11:14:12 10/16/23 (1)

RE: RCM specs and features - Lew 09:34:12 10/18/23 (0)

Follow Ups

RE: RCM specs and features - Goober58 18:35:17 10/16/23 (0)

RE: RCM specs and features

Post a Message!