Vinyl Asylum Welcome Licorice Pizza (LP) lovers! Setup guides and Vinyl FAQ. |
|
In Reply to: Vinyl article posted by Ryan T on July 31, 2017 at 19:24:02:
Provocative statement, I know. But one based on my own experience, which includes lots of analog and digital, in many formats, and also a lot of exposure to live music. IMO, the only reason to love digital is the convenience factor. In fact, issues with LPs drove me to digital originally - I wish I had owned a RCM back in the 70s and early 80s. I did like the longer playing time, the fact that you didn't need to dust them, and the ability to access tracks easily. But after going for CD in a big way, I ultimately found it to be flat and uninvolving compared to records. I then went to SACD, again in a big way, and discovered something very interesting, which was that, in general, the best sounding recordings were originally analog-sourced, followed by DSD sourced, and bringing up the rear, PCM sourced.
One of the things I don't like today are digitally sourced LPs - man, they just don't sound as good as analog sourced LPs. Too bad so many of them are made this way these days. Listen to John Fogerty's "Wrote a Song for Everyone" vs any LP that CCR or Fogerty did in the analog period to hear what I am saying. I love "Wrote a Song for Everyone", but the sound is completely inferior to the old days.
Not a lot of people read the magazine Fanfare, but I have been subscriber since the 70s. Lately we have seen a lot of CD remasterings and reissues of Decca recordings made in the 50s - interesting to hear the reviewers state how GOOD these sound vs. more recent recordings. Progress in 60 years -not there, if sound quality is your touchstone.
It is a lot cheaper and easier to record and edit with digital. Too bad it results in an inferior product.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Digital is inferior - TGR 09:08:33 08/01/17 (24)
- One way that digital is better - 1973shovel 07:40:09 08/03/17 (0)
- Blanket statements are inferior... - musetap 05:53:11 08/02/17 (1)
- I see what you did there. - jusbe 07:47:38 08/02/17 (0)
- RE: Digital is inferior - flood2 03:34:43 08/02/17 (0)
- XA9000ES problems - jeromelang 20:30:18 08/01/17 (0)
- Vinyl is inferior - Chris from Lafayette 09:35:37 08/01/17 (18)
- Thank you for crediting me, but... - Lew 20:54:53 08/01/17 (2)
- Oops - sorry for the mistake! - Chris from Lafayette 21:19:16 08/01/17 (1)
- "Religion is the opiate of the masses." - Lew 06:46:32 08/02/17 (0)
- Vinyl is inferior? Not really, Vinyl actually is technically superior. - Analog Scott 20:49:34 08/01/17 (10)
- Funny - those aren't MY perceptions! ;-) - Chris from Lafayette 21:09:45 08/01/17 (9)
- ah but here is the catch. - Analog Scott 21:16:39 08/01/17 (8)
- RE: ah but here is the catch. - E-Stat 08:30:34 08/02/17 (0)
- Not a big admirer of James Boyk either - Chris from Lafayette 21:27:06 08/01/17 (6)
- RE: Not a big admirer of James Boyk either - Tre' 08:56:10 08/03/17 (3)
- James Boyk in a nutshell - Chris from Lafayette 09:28:50 08/03/17 (1)
- RE: James Boyk in a nutshell - Analog Scott 10:01:52 08/03/17 (0)
- RE: Not a big admirer of James Boyk either - Analog Scott 09:06:47 08/03/17 (0)
- well yes and no - Analog Scott 01:12:11 08/02/17 (1)
- "Variations in mastering and source tapes matter more" - Chris from Lafayette 12:26:54 08/02/17 (0)
- You're also all SS......hmm. What comprised your analog setup prior to the onset of digital mania? nt - Rick W 12:09:12 08/01/17 (3)
- BTW, not ALL SS - one of my amps is a hybrid [nt] - Chris from Lafayette 12:37:51 08/01/17 (0)
- Sold to some "lucky" buyer! ;-) - Chris from Lafayette 12:35:08 08/01/17 (1)
- Micro Seiki/Dynavector sure ain't bad. Guess going multi-channel eliminates vinyl for you anyway, eh? nt - Rick W 13:06:31 08/01/17 (0)