The budget labels named are on "average" quite awful but, digital records just suck

Posted by richardl (A) on June 26, 2017 at 15:45:13

In Reply to: RE: Help with pricing a record collection posted by Jim E on June 25, 2017 at 18:27:11:

They just are not worth owning in the end. I have plenty of London digital records and they are not equal to good analogue recordings at all even at their best. London digital are flat and dead sounding to me. "Turnabout, CBS Odyssey, Nonesuch, Angel, Vox, RCA Gold, Seraphin, Musical Heritage Society" are in my experience never worth owning, they are a waste of space and sifting through hundreds of them to find (by listening. YUCK!) the few good ones is too painful to be tolerated and yes i have done this before.

Richard

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Help with pricing a record collection - Da He Hua 07:01:35 06/25/17 (8)

RE: Help with pricing a record collection - Da He Hua 19:52:33 07/10/17 (0)

I have to laugh just a bit - jedrider 10:13:05 06/26/17 (1)

Oh yes...nt - EdAInWestOC 11:46:03 06/26/17 (0)

Sadly I have never found a gold mine in record collections. They have all been dumpster fodder.. - 3+4=5 07:48:03 06/26/17 (1)

It often depends on where you're looking - Jeffrey Lee 08:40:11 06/26/17 (0)

RE: Help with pricing a record collection - Jim E 18:27:11 06/25/17 (2)

The budget labels named are on "average" quite awful but, digital records just suck - richardl 15:45:13 06/26/17 (0)

RE: Help with pricing a record collection - cactuscowboy@bresnan.net 15:17:26 06/26/17 (0)

Follow Ups

The budget labels named are on "average" quite awful but, digital records just suck - richardl 15:45:13 06/26/17 (0)

The budget labels named are on "average" quite awful but, digital records just suck

Post a Message!