Vinyl Asylum Welcome Licorice Pizza (LP) lovers! Setup guides and Vinyl FAQ. |
|
In Reply to: RE: I'm not as sanguine about Solti - but I don't think it was all his fault posted by robertkeir on May 17, 2017 at 20:42:11:
It's funny about what Decca was doing in Chicago during the Solti era. I haven't heard the Brahms set you mention, but I used to have the Solti/CSO and Maazel/Cleveland recordings of La Mer (both recorded by Decca), and the Maazel recording seemed far more natural than the Solti (better performance too - at least IMHO!). Heck, I'd even claim that many (although certainly not all) of the Decca Mehta/LAPO recordings from that era were better engineered than those with Solti and the CSO. In addition, during this same era, EMI made a number of recordings with Giulini and the CSO, and IMHO they got a far more natural sound than Decca was getting at that time for Solti. (OTOH, the Giulini/CSO recordings on DG were to my ears comparable to the Deccas in the audibility of the multi-miking.)
I suppose a lot of this is just personal perception, but I do think that we agree that Solti suffered somewhat from the engineering he received, especially during his earlier years in Chicago.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Yes - I agree about the Mercury Kubelik recordings - Chris from Lafayette 09:04:01 05/18/17 (6)
- RE: Yes, Decca Mehta/LAPO - Mel 12:36:22 05/18/17 (1)
- Just by chance, I was listening to the Mehta Mahler 3 in my car earlier today - Chris from Lafayette 00:20:32 05/19/17 (0)
- Solti/CSO Brahms... - kuma 12:11:14 05/18/17 (1)
- My favoite Brahms First. I wish the other 3 were as good as the first. - Opus 33 1/3 17:48:49 05/18/17 (0)
- RE: Yes - I agree about the Mercury Kubelik recordings - Inmate51 10:35:21 05/18/17 (1)
- I don't disagree with any of that - Chris from Lafayette 00:22:21 05/19/17 (0)