RE: SRA and VTA (What do you see?0

Posted by flood2 (A) on May 9, 2017 at 12:21:10

In Reply to: RE: SRA and VTA (What do you see?0 posted by raya on May 8, 2017 at 19:47:58:

You have to get the view exactly side on like John's excellent photos. At the moment, the parallax error is too large to make any judgement of any kind.
The degree to which the SRA really matters depends on the tip profile. For example, if you have a Shibata, you cannot possibly determine the SRA unless you have sufficient magnification to see the cut itself; given the curving line, you also need to see the contact portion to determine the SRA.

Presumably it sounds off to you if you are asking the question?
Remember that unless you compensate for individual record thickness you are sort of wasting your time obsessing about any error you are hearing with a particular record! You would only be optimising for that one record and since the standard allows for a variation from 0 to 5 degrees, the "recommended" 2 degree angle is at best an average. You are always bound to get an outlier that sounds off even with the best alignment.

Regards Anthony

"Beauty is Truth, Truth Beauty.." Keats

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - SRA and VTA (What do you see?0 - raya 10:33:27 05/08/17 (7)

Just for the record (pardon the expression) - Ralph 09:35:34 05/09/17 (2)

RE: Just for the record (pardon the expression) - flood2 12:07:13 05/09/17 (1)

RE: Just for the record (pardon the expression) - Ralph 13:43:48 05/09/17 (0)

RE: SRA and VTA (What do you see?0 - oilmanmojo 11:54:19 05/08/17 (2)

RE: SRA and VTA (What do you see?0 - raya 19:47:58 05/08/17 (1)

RE: SRA and VTA (What do you see?0 - flood2 12:21:10 05/09/17 (0)

RE: SRA and VTA (What do you see?0 - John Elison 11:47:52 05/08/17 (0)

Follow Ups

RE: SRA and VTA (What do you see?0 - flood2 12:21:10 05/09/17 (0)

RE: SRA and VTA (What do you see?0

Post a Message!