Vinyl Asylum Welcome Licorice Pizza (LP) lovers! Setup guides and Vinyl FAQ. |
|
In Reply to: RE: AFAIK copying an analog tape to digital is a transfer, not remastering. posted by flood2 on May 9, 2017 at 12:00:31:
However the production of a vinyl cut ALWAYS involves some sonic change to the master - mainly in the HF regionJust to be sure I understand what you're saying -- production of a vinyl cut always involves some sonic change to the COPY of the master, not to the actual master tape, correct? The master tape is sacrosanct, it is what the entire team worked hard on until they agreed that it sounds perfect (or as close as perfect) to how they envision it should sound. No one should be messing with that tape.
I do realize that it is nearly impossible to replicate the sound of the master tape when cutting vinyl. However, that's the INTENTION of the crew cutting the vinyl. The final commercial product should sound as close as possible to how its authors prefer it to sound. Otherwise, if that were immaterial, why would the team ever even bother mastering it?
Edits: 05/09/17
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: AFAIK copying an analog tape to digital is a transfer, not remastering. - magiccarpetride 12:08:18 05/09/17 (4)
- RE: AFAIK copying an analog tape to digital is a transfer, not remastering. - flood2 13:19:58 05/09/17 (0)
- RE: AFAIK copying an analog tape to digital is a transfer, not remastering. - Tre' 12:49:52 05/09/17 (2)
- RE: AFAIK copying an analog tape to digital is a transfer, not remastering. - magiccarpetride 15:11:00 05/09/17 (1)
- RE: AFAIK copying an analog tape to digital is a transfer, not remastering. - Tre' 17:04:58 05/09/17 (0)