|
Tweakers' Asylum Tweaks for systems, rooms and Do It Yourself (DIY) help. FAQ. |
|
|
|
Tweakers' Asylum Tweaks for systems, rooms and Do It Yourself (DIY) help. FAQ. |
|
In Reply to: Re: It doesn't supply gain, it does supply 30% plus distortion... posted by Trevor Wilson on December 22, 1999 at 22:26:23:
Look, you may be correct in certainpoints here, but to state "it cannot serve any other purpose' is an odd thing to say.
I have owned one of these since it was first produced, bought it with a no quibble full refund option and have found it very useful in certain equipment.
What I hear being stated here is a version of the old minimum interference with the signal produces the best sound arguement.
I would call that spurious at best.
Lets first ask why there is this outpouring of hatred?
In my system of the time, the effect was to produce a deeper, slightly warmer bass and a sweeter top. I wasn't going to complain.
Were my ears lying to me to betray the holy grail of pure hifi?
This is nonsense.
It seems that Trevor has the problem, not Musical Fidelity. I presume all the people who like Musical Fidelity equipment are either wrong (what would that mean?) or, in the case of reviewers, bribed (?).
No wonder trevor is connected to something called Rage Audio.
Rage far too loudly if you ask me.
Might I ask why you have this hatred of MF?
Me thinks the lady protesteth too much.....
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- what? - dave c 01:45:49 12/23/99 (4)
- Re: what? - Trevor Wilson 14:45:34 12/23/99 (3)
- we: rot - dave c 17:31:27 12/23/99 (2)
- Re: we: rot - Trevor Wilson 00:07:07 12/24/99 (1)
- that's it..... - dave c 13:01:27 12/24/99 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
