![]() |
Tweakers' Asylum Tweaks for systems, rooms and Do It Yourself (DIY) help. FAQ. |
|
We know that capacitors with same capacitance in parallel reduce overall ESR ,and dig quite a bit "deeper" at same resonance point "valley" as well.
Some researches suggest that anti-paralleling such identical capacitors (non-polar) make such effect more pronounced:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324381560_Calculation_of_Parasitic_Self_and_Mutual_Inductances_of_Thin_Film_Capacitors_for_Power_Line_Filters#pf2
(figure 6)
https://groupdiy.com/threads/simple-way-to-reduce-distortion-from-electrolytic-capacitors.36210/
Since capacitors in speaker crossovers are mostly non-polar, which would certianly be safe for anti-parallel, but with "resonance point" altered, would it screw up "transition" between driver's frequency? Has anyone tried?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Has anyone tried "anti-parallel" capacitors in speaker crossover? - KAIBER 11:20:47 01/14/24 (4)
- RE: Has anyone tried "anti-parallel" capacitors in speaker crossover? - Jon Risch 13:25:31 01/20/24 (2)
- RE: Has anyone tried "anti-parallel" capacitors in speaker crossover? - Jon Risch 13:33:00 01/20/24 (1)
- RE: Has anyone tried "anti-parallel" capacitors in speaker crossover? - KAIBER 04:03:31 01/21/24 (0)
- The issue with resonance is related to 50Hz and 60Hz "signals" - Chip647 13:49:26 01/14/24 (0)