Tweakers' Asylum Tweaks for systems, rooms and Do It Yourself (DIY) help. FAQ. |
|
In Reply to: RE: EAR Isodamp C-1002 equiptment feet posted by fastcat on October 24, 2020 at 06:59:43:
I use MF-1010 (C-1002) feet and have been happy with four of them on equipment up to around 25lbs. I've looked at the MF-1010 in other materials: V-2325, V-2590, and V-2775. The C-1002 has the lowest transmissibility of these. On the Versadamp spec sheet there is a graph of transmissibility relative to frequency. Before getting to "try it and see," would you think that audio electronics would benefit from targeting a specific frequency range for the material's peak transmissibility, as well as where it's lowest?
It looks like Partsconnexion has raised the price of their MF-1010 feet. Since I'm interested in listening test results, I'd be willing to mail someone four MF-1010 C-1002 feet if they want to do some comparisons. (CONUS only, I've got black or blue.)
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: EAR Isodamp C-1002 equiptment feet - willsw 09:06:57 10/25/20 (4)
- RE: EAR Isodamp C-1002 equiptment feet - fastcat 09:46:59 10/25/20 (3)
- RE: EAR Isodamp C-1002 equiptment feet - willsw 12:18:54 10/25/20 (2)
- RE: EAR Isodamp C-1002 equiptment feet - Duster 01:32:29 10/26/20 (0)
- RE: EAR Isodamp C-1002 equiptment feet - tweaker456 13:56:13 10/25/20 (0)