I stand by my posting that you are too quick to judgment about what science knows.

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Fuse orientation change - a real eye-opener - Japesgalore 12:03:32 04/15/10 (67)

RE: Fuse orientation change - a real eye-opener - ToneMad 03:51:17 05/01/10 (0)

AC Fuse orientation - stvnharr 19:52:17 04/17/10 (9)

Consider - unclestu 18:08:18 04/18/10 (0)

RE: AC Fuse orientation - Japesgalore 19:57:53 04/17/10 (7)

Fuse orientation - stvnharr 01:52:20 04/18/10 (2)

RE: Fuse orientation - Japesgalore 07:12:32 04/18/10 (1)

RE: Fuse orientation - stvnharr 15:10:18 04/18/10 (0)

RE: AC Fuse orientation - jbcortes 01:13:56 04/18/10 (3)

RE: AC Fuse orientation - Japesgalore 08:29:13 04/18/10 (2)

RE: AC Fuse orientation - Sebrof 14:52:09 04/18/10 (0)

RE: AC Fuse orientation - jbcortes 09:19:22 04/18/10 (0)

RE: Fuse orientation change - a real eye-opener - DaveT 07:59:43 04/16/10 (0)

RE: Fuse orientation change - a real eye-opener - ramw 02:00:58 04/16/10 (0)

Audiophilia nervosa... - jbcortes 01:38:07 04/16/10 (52)

All science is based on observations. - Norm 07:26:07 04/17/10 (4)

What most people - unclestu 14:17:56 04/21/10 (1)

Correction - unclestu 02:00:57 04/23/10 (0)

Hear hear! - rick_m 08:51:59 04/17/10 (1)

RE: Hear hear! - unclestu 18:05:35 04/18/10 (0)

RE: Audiophilia nervosa... - Sebrof 19:03:35 04/16/10 (43)

Hah, you're on! - Japesgalore 17:13:01 04/17/10 (42)

RE: Hah, you're on! - Sebrof 19:56:41 04/17/10 (41)

RE: Hah, you're on! - Japesgalore 20:34:43 04/17/10 (40)

RE: Hah, you're on! - Sebrof 07:12:23 04/18/10 (39)

"Actually I believe it's the science of how our brains perceive the world around us, and it's very well known. - Norm 07:26:13 04/18/10 (36)

RE: "Actually I believe it's the science of how our brains perceive the world around us, and it's very well kn - Sebrof 08:23:21 04/18/10 (35)

Just out of curiosity... - unclestu 17:45:06 04/18/10 (21)

RE: Just out of curiosity... - Sebrof 18:34:31 04/18/10 (20)

Galileo. - unclestu 20:17:28 04/18/10 (19)

Stu... - jbcortes 00:26:47 04/19/10 (6)

Interesting - unclestu 01:56:06 04/19/10 (5)

RE: Interesting - jbcortes 02:57:52 04/19/10 (4)

regarding measurements - unclestu 14:33:18 04/21/10 (0)

Everything you say up to a point I can agree with. - Norm 09:03:26 04/19/10 (2)

RE: Everything you say up to a point I can agree with. - jbcortes 09:10:14 04/19/10 (1)

No further comment is needed, especially after "speaks volumes!"nt - Norm 09:22:34 04/19/10 (0)

RE: Galileo. - Sebrof 21:11:54 04/18/10 (11)

And yet - unclestu 01:45:38 04/19/10 (10)

Since you're mentionning wine, have you heard of the Brochet experiment? - jbcortes 06:54:55 04/19/10 (9)

Too bad - unclestu 11:46:50 04/19/10 (8)

We've both expressed our points, that's fine - jbcortes 13:37:16 04/19/10 (7)

Don't know - unclestu 18:34:28 04/19/10 (6)

RE: Don't know - jbcortes 23:34:30 04/19/10 (5)

Sheesh! - unclestu 13:43:22 04/21/10 (4)

Fine then! - jbcortes 13:50:06 04/21/10 (3)

"make me believe that it does" - unclestu 15:55:53 04/21/10 (0)

Seems to me - unclestu 15:45:19 04/21/10 (1)

RE: Seems to me - jbcortes 00:06:05 04/22/10 (0)

You don't know anything about science. And to state that something is impossible is evidence of this. nt - Norm 09:20:08 04/18/10 (12)

Actually Sebrof is absolutely right (nt) - jbcortes 09:57:24 04/18/10 (11)

Only if you want to believe we know everything about nature's laws. - Norm 15:10:17 04/18/10 (10)

RE: Only if you want to believe we know everything about nature's laws. - Sebrof 16:33:06 04/18/10 (9)

I stand by my posting that you are too quick to judgment about what science knows. - Norm 18:03:24 04/18/10 (8)

The problem here... - jbcortes 00:19:05 04/19/10 (7)

I hear a difference when I don't know which is in. What is your conclusion? - Norm 08:50:33 04/19/10 (6)

I say it's totally meaningless unless validated by a blind test - jbcortes 09:00:29 04/19/10 (5)

All that I can say is that your statement is totally meaningless to me & invalid. - Norm 09:19:55 04/19/10 (4)

Pity - jbcortes 09:48:01 04/19/10 (3)

With your condescension you should expect an angry retort. - Norm 12:54:06 04/19/10 (2)

RE: With your condescension you should expect an angry retort. - jbcortes 13:45:46 04/19/10 (1)

I see no value in even a "good" blind test and am surprised that you do, but hey we all do what we want. nt - Norm 10:01:38 04/21/10 (0)

RE: Hah, you're on! - Japesgalore 07:25:08 04/18/10 (1)

RE: Hah, you're on! - Sebrof 14:58:13 04/18/10 (0)

RE: "I couldn't tell them apart." - 1973shovel 04:36:28 04/16/10 (2)

RE: "I couldn't tell them apart." - jbcortes 05:26:44 04/16/10 (1)

Thanks, that's what I thought you meant - 1973shovel 19:10:17 04/16/10 (0)

It depends on the system and gear but... - kuma 22:08:16 04/15/10 (0)

Follow Ups

I stand by my posting that you are too quick to judgment about what science knows. - Norm 18:03:24 04/18/10 (8)

The problem here... - jbcortes 00:19:05 04/19/10 (7)

I hear a difference when I don't know which is in. What is your conclusion? - Norm 08:50:33 04/19/10 (6)

I say it's totally meaningless unless validated by a blind test - jbcortes 09:00:29 04/19/10 (5)

All that I can say is that your statement is totally meaningless to me & invalid. - Norm 09:19:55 04/19/10 (4)

Pity - jbcortes 09:48:01 04/19/10 (3)

With your condescension you should expect an angry retort. - Norm 12:54:06 04/19/10 (2)

RE: With your condescension you should expect an angry retort. - jbcortes 13:45:46 04/19/10 (1)

I see no value in even a "good" blind test and am surprised that you do, but hey we all do what we want. nt - Norm 10:01:38 04/21/10 (0)

Post a Message!