|
Tweakers' Asylum Tweaks for systems, rooms and Do It Yourself (DIY) help. FAQ. |
|
|
|
Tweakers' Asylum Tweaks for systems, rooms and Do It Yourself (DIY) help. FAQ. |
|
In Reply to: Re: I don't think those guys are done fiddling with it posted by mmhifi on March 31, 2007 at 13:45:45:
You are very strange man. Sometimes you look to be decent technician and audiophile. But sometimes... Well, if we have discussion on Bybee you look full-length idiot. And I will explane why. You look as full-lenght idiot because you don't want to listen,listen,listen,listen,listen,listen... 1000 times listen.What has listening to do with anything I've said beside absolutely nothing?
I could listen until the Green Party won the presidency and the hand-waving bullshit that's been spewed by Bybee and Curl wouldn't be any less hand-waving bullshit.
Personally I put 2 sleapstrem Bybees in B+ supply line of my tubed pre and was floored by cleanising effect of devices. And I didn't suspect there was noise at all.Great. Glad you're happy.
Personally I prefer to not patronize those who blow smoke up my ass trying to sell me something.
Or maybe you are deaf? It can be, I know of a lot of deaf audio designers and technicians in my country for example.Again, tell me what listening has to do with anything I've said.
se
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups Full ThreadTopic - Bybee's - read this what you think? - foodfeak 23:51:31 03/30/07 (158)
- Some ancient history......... - Roger Hill 18:38:19 04/03/07 (3)
- Thanks for the history lesson! - rick_m 05:24:41 04/04/07 (2)
- Re: Thanks for the history lesson! - Dan Banquer 05:29:13 04/04/07 (1)
- Re: Seems it puts d-e-e-p dent in your reputation only(nt) - mmhifi 05:41:02 04/04/07 (0)
- Re: Poor D.B. - mmhifi 10:48:13 04/03/07 (34)
- the problem with listening explanation............ - snkby 09:13:19 04/04/07 (0)
- Re: Poor D.B. - unclestu52 23:34:58 04/03/07 (17)
- Knowledge is wealth - Dan Banquer 04:42:31 04/04/07 (16)
- question, and an honest one, - unclestu52 18:15:24 04/04/07 (15)
- Re: question, and an honest one, - john curl 14:08:30 04/05/07 (6)
- Re: question, and an honest one, - unclestu52 20:15:41 04/06/07 (3)
- Re: question, and an honest one, - john curl 15:58:26 04/07/07 (0)
- Re: question, and an honest one, - john curl 20:55:51 04/06/07 (1)
- ROTFLMAO! nt. - Dan Banquer 06:54:39 04/07/07 (0)
- Re: question, and an honest one, - john curl 00:42:33 04/06/07 (0)
- If you could answer a simple question it would be a miracle. nt - Dan Banquer 16:05:45 04/05/07 (0)
- Re: question, and an honest one, - Dan Banquer 04:29:34 04/05/07 (7)
- So in other words - unclestu52 03:44:19 04/08/07 (6)
- Re: So in other words - Dan Banquer 15:02:58 04/08/07 (0)
- There no other words! - Dan Banquer 07:41:59 04/08/07 (4)
- An honest question - unclestu52 01:23:24 04/11/07 (3)
- Re: An honest question - john curl 15:35:26 04/12/07 (2)
- Olsher's review, - unclestu52 13:23:12 04/17/07 (1)
- Re: Olsher's review, - john curl 11:13:07 04/20/07 (0)
- Really? - Dan Banquer 11:30:00 04/03/07 (14)
- Focus on more than one word... - QuadTodd 18:32:40 04/03/07 (2)
- Re: Focus on reality - Dan Banquer 04:43:48 04/04/07 (1)
- Re: Focus on reality - QuadTodd 07:51:48 04/04/07 (0)
- Re: Really - mmhifi 14:02:57 04/03/07 (10)
- Are you smoking crack? - Dan Banquer 15:05:55 04/03/07 (9)
- Re: OK,your credibility isn't important to you...(nt) - mmhifi 15:21:33 04/03/07 (8)
- Lost in Translation - Dan Banquer 04:45:37 04/04/07 (0)
- Re: OK,your credibility isn't important to you...(nt) - john curl 16:59:44 04/03/07 (5)
- The shoe's on the other foot Con Man. - Dan Banquer 17:10:04 04/03/07 (4)
- Administrivia - Let's get back to the topic and (try) to leave the crap behind. - Ted Smith 17:34:46 04/03/07 (0)
- Re: The shoe's on the other foot Con Man. - john curl 17:13:09 04/03/07 (2)
- Reality Check - Dan Banquer 04:55:46 04/04/07 (0)
- Re: The shoe's on the other foot Con Man. - ivanlee 18:04:29 04/03/07 (0)
- Yep; you're smoking crack.nt) - Dan Banquer 15:54:11 04/03/07 (0)
- Will somebody please - nightdoggy 03:44:37 04/03/07 (3)
- Re: Will somebody please - Dan Banquer 05:46:57 04/03/07 (2)
- I knew when I posted that they would never come clean - nightdoggy 08:23:55 04/03/07 (1)
- Re: I knew when I posted that they would never come clean - Dan Banquer 08:48:09 04/03/07 (0)
- i thought the isolation ward was created for this kinda stuff ? nt - snkby 20:56:34 04/02/07 (1)
- I think progress was being made on a few sub threads... It's never too late :) [nt] - Ted Smith 21:20:44 04/02/07 (0)
- A clue to an explanation. - Al Sekela 12:29:33 04/02/07 (5)
- Or you can match the impedances. - rick_m 06:30:55 04/04/07 (4)
- Yes, but some sources cannot handle such a low load impedance. - Al Sekela 10:13:50 04/04/07 (3)
- Good idea! - rick_m 12:30:13 04/04/07 (2)
- Loading effects can be subtle. - Al Sekela 17:23:22 04/05/07 (1)
- Re: Loading effects can be subtle. - rick_m 20:30:25 04/05/07 (0)
- I never met a Bybee filter that I liked for more than a month or so. I would recommend easy removal. nt - Norm 07:01:17 04/02/07 (0)
- Banquer's Bullshit - more banquer BS 20:42:46 04/01/07 (2)
- Re: Banquer's Bullshit - Steve Eddy 21:37:23 04/01/07 (1)
- Re: Banquer's Bullshit - chris_w 09:40:53 04/02/07 (0)
- Wading into the waters (I'll probably regret it) - Tuckers 18:14:24 03/31/07 (39)
- Re: Wading into the waters (I'll probably regret it) - Dan Banquer 06:54:49 04/01/07 (38)
- The outer conductance - rick_m 10:11:25 04/02/07 (17)
- Re: The outer conductance - Dan Banquer 10:43:42 04/02/07 (16)
- Re: The outer conductance - rick_m 11:09:55 04/02/07 (7)
- Re: The outer conductance - Dan Banquer 11:36:31 04/02/07 (6)
- P.S. - Dan Banquer 11:41:45 04/02/07 (5)
- Thinking complete... - rick_m 13:01:13 04/02/07 (4)
- Re: Thinking complete... - Dan Banquer 15:46:04 04/02/07 (3)
- Re: Thinking complete... - rick_m 17:55:20 04/02/07 (2)
- Think Marketing! - Dan Banquer 04:30:06 04/03/07 (1)
- Re: Think Marketing! - rick_m 07:04:48 04/03/07 (0)
- Re: The outer conductance - john curl 10:52:11 04/02/07 (7)
- Re: The outer conductance - rick_m 14:58:25 04/02/07 (0)
- Re: The outer conductance - Dan Banquer 11:03:05 04/02/07 (5)
- Bybee filters, - unclestu52 02:26:12 04/05/07 (1)
- Re: Bybee filters, - rick_m 08:20:16 04/05/07 (0)
- Re: The outer conductance - john curl 11:07:39 04/02/07 (2)
- Phishing Expedition - Dan Banquer 11:15:34 04/02/07 (1)
- Re: Phishing Expedition - john curl 11:51:01 04/02/07 (0)
- Re: Wading into the waters (I'll probably regret it) - Ted Smith 12:27:55 04/01/07 (11)
- Re: Wading into the waters (I'll probably regret it) - Dan Banquer 04:23:10 04/02/07 (10)
- Re: Wading into the waters (I'll probably regret it) - Ted Smith 09:29:52 04/02/07 (8)
- Re: Wading into the waters (I'll probably regret it) - Dan Banquer 09:35:36 04/02/07 (7)
- Just what I thought - Ted Smith 12:31:27 04/02/07 (6)
- Re: Just what I thought - Dan Banquer 12:33:20 04/02/07 (5)
- Yep, exactly the behaviour I expected - Ted Smith 12:46:12 04/02/07 (4)
- Phish elsewhere, I'm not interested. - Dan Banquer 12:51:23 04/02/07 (3)
- I saw them, they strengthen my point. [nt] - Ted Smith 12:58:53 04/02/07 (2)
- Have a nice day [nt] - Dan Banquer 13:07:29 04/02/07 (1)
- You too [nt] - Ted Smith 13:12:24 04/02/07 (0)
- P.S. - Dan Banquer 05:33:41 04/02/07 (0)
- Re: Wading into the waters (I'll probably regret it) - john curl 10:38:48 04/01/07 (7)
- Re: Wading into the waters (I'll probably regret it) - Dan Banquer 11:32:01 04/01/07 (6)
- Re: Wading into the waters (I'll probably regret it) - john curl 13:20:50 04/01/07 (5)
- Re: Wading into the waters (I'll probably regret it) - Dan Banquer 04:25:06 04/02/07 (4)
- Re: Wading into the waters (I'll probably regret it) - john curl 10:42:51 04/02/07 (3)
- Re: Wading into the waters (I'll probably regret it) - Dan Banquer 10:55:05 04/02/07 (2)
- Re: Wading into the waters (I'll probably regret it) - john curl 11:05:40 04/02/07 (1)
- Phish Elsewhere, I'm not interested. nt - Dan Banquer 11:16:41 04/02/07 (0)
- Re: Bybee's - read this what you think? - CD 13:26:32 03/31/07 (12)
- Re: Bybee's - read this what you think? - unclestu52 14:07:25 03/31/07 (5)
- Re: Bybee's - read this what you think? - Dan Banquer 14:16:01 03/31/07 (4)
- tried it.... - unclestu52 00:40:52 04/01/07 (3)
- Re: tried it.... - john curl 10:02:53 04/01/07 (1)
- Re: tried it.... - Dan Banquer 11:34:37 04/01/07 (0)
- Not from your description. - Dan Banquer 06:49:25 04/01/07 (0)
- Re: Bybee's - read this what you think? - john curl 14:02:44 03/31/07 (5)
- Re: Bybee's - read this what you think? - Dan Banquer 14:08:57 03/31/07 (4)
- Re: Bybee's - read this what you think? - john curl 14:15:14 03/31/07 (3)
- Re: Bybee's - read this what you think? - Dan Banquer 14:17:13 03/31/07 (2)
- Re: Bybee's - read this what you think? - john curl 10:13:35 04/01/07 (1)
- Re: Bybee's - read this what you think? - Dan Banquer 11:36:30 04/01/07 (0)
- Cool. Thanks for posting this - - hukkfinn 09:00:32 03/31/07 (0)
- I don't think those guys are done fiddling with it - mattcecil1@yahoo.com 08:13:11 03/31/07 (48)
- Re: I don't think those guys are done fiddling with it - john curl 09:32:41 03/31/07 (47)
- JC why do you even get involved with these things? - nightdoggy 16:27:10 03/31/07 (19)
- Re: JC why do you even get involved with these things? - john curl 19:44:28 03/31/07 (18)
- Having spent a small fortune on cables and tweaks - nightdoggy 05:58:41 04/01/07 (0)
- Re: JC why do you even get involved with these things? - Dawnrazor 22:00:48 03/31/07 (16)
- Re: JC why do you even get involved with these things? - john curl 22:16:04 03/31/07 (15)
- Re: JC why do you even get involved with these things? - Steve Eddy 23:16:58 03/31/07 (14)
- Re: JC why do you even get involved with these things? - john curl 01:28:28 04/01/07 (13)
- Re: JC why do you even get involved with these things? - Steve Eddy 09:05:40 04/01/07 (12)
- Re: JC why do you even get involved with these things? - john curl 20:16:23 04/02/07 (11)
- Re: JC why do you even get involved with these things? - Steve Eddy 21:40:48 04/02/07 (10)
- Steve, you shouldn't talk about Commander McBybee that way. - andy_c 21:05:48 04/06/07 (1)
- HA HA HA - That's priceless! (nt) - nightdoggy 12:49:07 04/10/07 (0)
- Administrivia - Keep it clean... NPI :) [nt] - Ted Smith 23:01:46 04/02/07 (1)
- Keep it clean? - Steve Eddy 23:52:29 04/02/07 (0)
- Re: JC why do you even get involved with these things? - john curl 22:02:06 04/02/07 (5)
- Re: JC why do you even get involved with these things? - Steve Eddy 23:50:40 04/02/07 (4)
- Re: JC why do you even get involved with these things? - john curl 01:38:13 04/03/07 (3)
- Re: JC why do you even get involved with these things? - Steve Eddy 10:06:12 04/03/07 (2)
- Re: JC why do you even get involved with these things? - john curl 10:19:27 04/03/07 (1)
- Re: JC why do you even get involved with these things? - Steve Eddy 12:39:39 04/03/07 (0)
- I'm shuddering in my boots. - Dan Banquer 13:29:23 03/31/07 (0)
- Re: I don't think those guys are done fiddling with it - Steve Eddy 13:27:13 03/31/07 (20)
- Re: I don't think those guys are done fiddling with it - mmhifi 13:45:45 03/31/07 (19)
- Re: I don't think those guys are done fiddling with it - Steve Eddy 14:48:59 03/31/07 (1)
- I'm with you on this one Steve - nightdoggy 16:36:38 03/31/07 (0)
- Re: I don't think those guys are done fiddling with it - john curl 14:05:29 03/31/07 (16)
- Re: I don't think those guys are done fiddling with it - Steve Eddy 14:54:30 03/31/07 (15)
- Re: I don't think those guys are done fiddling with it - 120nwb 17:11:18 03/31/07 (14)
- Re: I don't think those guys are done fiddling with it - john curl 17:20:05 03/31/07 (13)
- so physics = woo? - CD 10:53:11 04/01/07 (11)
- Re: so physics = woo? - john curl 11:20:51 04/01/07 (10)
- Re: so physics = woo? - Dan Banquer 04:55:53 04/02/07 (7)
- Hey DB i thought RPG were proven to work !! - chris_w 09:59:39 04/02/07 (6)
- RPG as in Rocket Propelled Grenade nt. - Dan Banquer 10:10:05 04/02/07 (5)
- Yep you've definatley let off one of those :¬) - chris_w 00:45:40 04/03/07 (4)
- Re: Yep you've definatley let off one of those :¬) - Dan Banquer 04:49:25 04/03/07 (3)
- Rock on Dan - nightdoggy 13:52:38 04/03/07 (2)
- Re: Rock on Dan - chris_w 03:23:21 04/04/07 (0)
- Re: Rock on Dan - Dan Banquer 15:07:40 04/03/07 (0)
- ooh, classified! so I was right about double-secret! - CD 14:52:12 04/01/07 (1)
- Re: ooh, classified! so I was right about double-secret! - john curl 14:59:22 04/01/07 (0)
- Re: I don't think those guys are done fiddling with it - Steve Eddy 19:28:46 03/31/07 (0)
- Re: I don't think those guys are done fiddling with it - rick_m 09:55:40 03/31/07 (4)
- Re: I don't think those guys are done fiddling with it - john curl 10:00:48 03/31/07 (3)
- Great analogy! nt - clarkjohnsen 10:50:25 03/31/07 (2)
- Re: Great analogy! nt - nightdoggy 16:39:48 03/31/07 (1)
- "fascetious"? nt - clarkjohnsen 11:29:39 04/01/07 (0)
Follow Ups
- Re: I don't think those guys are done fiddling with it - Steve Eddy 14:48:59 03/31/07 (1)
- I'm with you on this one Steve - nightdoggy 16:36:38 03/31/07 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
