Tweakers' Asylum Tweaks for systems, rooms and Do It Yourself (DIY) help. FAQ. |
|
In Reply to: Is it better than the Grungebuster 2? posted by Mike B. on December 18, 2006 at 10:46:07:
The highs are better on my CDP w/ either the original Grungebuster or the 2.2- compared to not using one. I never tried a "2" - footers changed things on the HF too. As Al said a ball type that allows for horizontal play seems best to most people ears. Herbies tendefoot had nice(actually the best) image and dynamics but made the HF terrible. Somewhere a trade off must be made. Best you try things for yourself and find out what you like best. Herbies and a lot of other places have a satisfaction policy within 90 days.ET
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Is it better than the Grungebuster 2? - Awe-d-o-file 13:06:54 12/18/06 (0)