![]() |
Tweakers' Asylum Tweaks for systems, rooms and Do It Yourself (DIY) help. FAQ. |
|
I've read and heard from knowledgeable people here that using an impedence EQ (Zobel) on a tweeter cleans up response. But doesn't it reduce output slightly as frequency goes up?The reason I'm asking:
I've kinda settled on the Audax HM210C0 (8" carbon fiber) and the Seas H881 (27mm chambered textile) for my next project. The woofer appears it could benefit from such a slight rolloff as it's freqency graph is flat to ~1.5k but with a slight incline going up with frequency. The tweet, however, has a beautifully flat response that I want to preserve. I've also heard that this is a very smooth and neutral tweeter, and so don't feel it would need to be "cleansed". From what I know at this point, I'm inclined to use a Zobel on the woofer and a series notch on the tweeter with a 2k L-R 2nd order. This will be in an aperiodic enclosure. Any thoughts on this project are welcomed.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Zobel's attenuation on driver - hZ 01:25:08 05/03/99 (29)
- Just ran some numbers through Mathematica - Mart 01:47:30 05/06/99 (7)
- Just ran some numbers through Excel ... - Mart 23:46:04 05/06/99 (6)
- OK, so Mathematica says 2 variables were off ... - Mart 09:56:09 05/07/99 (5)
- got Mathematica to retrieve generic Conjugate(notch) values - Mart 23:46:29 05/10/99 (4)
- summary thus far... - Mart 12:22:58 05/12/99 (3)
- circuits in Theil-Small Parameters - Mart 05:54:46 05/14/99 (2)
- Yo JON RISCH - Mart 11:48:14 05/14/99 (1)
- FWIW, I could only reduce the 2 eqs to ... - Mart 13:37:21 05/14/99 (0)
- Re: Zobel's attenuation on driver - Jon Risch 18:17:17 05/04/99 (0)
- Re: Zobel's attenuation on driver - Mart 23:32:53 05/03/99 (2)
- Oh Martin, Come on. - Bentwrench 15:33:30 05/04/99 (1)
- Granted I'm no English major... - Mart 20:59:46 05/04/99 (0)
- Re: Zobel's attenuation on driver - BKing 11:38:08 05/03/99 (10)
- Re: Zobel's attenuation on driver - Edp 12:43:53 05/03/99 (9)
- Re: Zobel's attenuation on driver - BKing 16:56:39 05/04/99 (8)
- Re: Zobel's attenuation on driver - Jon Risch 17:58:40 05/04/99 (7)
- que: makes what conjugate "superfluous" ? (nt) - Mart 21:04:57 05/04/99 (6)
- Re: que: makes what conjugate "superfluous" ? (nt) - Jon Risch 23:19:06 05/04/99 (5)
- CONJUGATE =?= NOTCH FILTER (or Risch cap-less unit)? (nt) - Mart 00:30:41 05/05/99 (4)
- Re: CONJUGATE =?= NOTCH FILTER (or Risch cap-less unit)? (nt) - Jon Risch 18:25:17 05/05/99 (3)
- like thus ... - Mart 20:00:53 05/05/99 (2)
- Re: like thus ... - Jon Risch 19:52:13 05/06/99 (1)
- thanks (nt) - Mart 23:47:54 05/06/99 (0)
- Re: Zobel's attenuation on driver - abc 05:15:51 05/03/99 (5)
- inherently critically damped - Mart 23:29:31 05/03/99 (4)
- Re: inherently critically damped - hZ 23:34:35 05/03/99 (3)
- Re: inherently critically damped - Mart 00:35:37 05/04/99 (2)
- thanks - hZ 14:06:58 05/04/99 (1)
- do yourself a favor ... - Mart 16:47:17 05/04/99 (0)