Tubes Asylum Questions about tubes and gear that glows. FAQ |
|
In Reply to: RE: I wish I could agree with that posted by Jim McShane on February 27, 2017 at 11:20:54:
...who regularly curses at the boxes of rejected tubes. I will spare the horror stories, but they are indeed stories of horror.
It is possible that you are not concerned with the parameters that are important to us. The tubes we reject may, indeed, work in some other circuits.
But the bottom line remains - the NOS tubes are vastly superior.
It also appears that the quality has gone through its lowest point, when we rejected up to 40% of tubes. Today it is "only" about 20%.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- You would really have to disagree with our production manager... - Victor Khomenko 11:39:52 02/27/17 (7)
- RE: You would really have to disagree with our production manager... - Jim McShane 12:09:58 02/27/17 (6)
- We fail the tubes on three very common parameters - Victor Khomenko 12:31:35 02/27/17 (5)
- RE: We fail the tubes on three very common parameters - Michael Samra 14:44:27 03/02/17 (4)
- $400ea?????????????????????????????????????????? - Victor Khomenko 05:43:43 03/03/17 (3)
- RE: $400ea?????????????????????????????????????????? - Michael Samra 23:38:28 03/03/17 (2)
- RE: $400ea?????????????????????????????????????????? - Victor Khomenko 18:51:00 03/04/17 (0)
- RE: $400ea?????????????????????????????????????????? - twystd 17:44:12 03/04/17 (0)