Home Tubes Asylum

Questions about tubes and gear that glows. FAQ

I have to agree

64.131.24.217

Most vintage amps have simple signal paths which also
allow space for upgrading to current available production
parts like power supply capacitors and signal path caps
(which by the way should always be replaced in 30+ year old
gear). Look inside a Pilot 232 for example- the shoebox design
allows for point to point wiring which is always good, there's
plenty of space for potentially larger new parts, the transformers
for power and output were made in the heyday which would cost
significantly more to produce today- all good starting points.

A dynaco ST-70 doesn't have much space, but there's many aftermarket
kits readily available. And it will outperform most modern
economy amps without breathing hard. When you bring up old Macs,
the parts quality alone will push it way past the Jolida league.
No offense meant, just plain economics- even at the large prices
of anything older today, with proper upgrading they just plain sound
good and will be dependable. There are many forums for those with no experience to learn which parts to change and what to look out for. A leak Stereo 20 will not likely be a good cantidate in these examples, because it will require far more baby-sitting because of some weird design choices causing it to be more techie and less
trouble-free.

Now, modern bleeding edge gear will likely be more linear and
clearer, but for the dollar, even a $1500 HK Citation II will
be a damn fine sounding amp by anyones measure. I've even heard
that Bob Carver uses (6) Citation II's personally (and he made
the venerable Silver 7's). I suppose that could be heresay.

In any case, comparing Jolida, as good as they are for an entry level product, will be outclassed by most Mac gear.

RFG


This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  Kimber Kable  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups


You can not post to an archived thread.