|
Tubes Asylum Questions about tubes and gear that glows. FAQ |
|
|
|
Tubes Asylum Questions about tubes and gear that glows. FAQ |
|
In Reply to: Re: 6SJ7 VS. 6J7 posted by tyor on January 28, 2005 at 08:48:38:
I think I would prefer the shorter signal path to the grid on the 6SJ7 and under chassis termination suggesting better shielding with careful layout. However, I have not compared the two tubes in audio applications.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: 6SJ7 VS. 6J7 - Jimmy 11:58:40 01/28/05 (5)
- Re: 6SJ7 VS. 6J7 - Coresta 13:29:01 01/28/05 (4)
- Re: 6SJ7 VS. 6J7 - tyor 13:51:14 01/28/05 (3)
- Re: 6SJ7 VS. 6J7 - ShiFtY1000 20:23:30 01/28/05 (2)
- 1620's are low noise 6J7s - j rodney 18:04:16 01/29/05 (0)
- thanks for the tip nt - tyor 23:14:32 01/28/05 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
