Tubes Asylum Questions about tubes and gear that glows. FAQ |
|
In Reply to: Re: Question on impedance tabs vs. loudspeaker impedance posted by Victor Khomenko on September 16, 2004 at 06:34:36:
Thanks for your answer!Currently, I do drive my Magnepan 1.6 QR off the 2 ohm tab, simply because Maggies are said to need current rather than voltage - and that's what I learned in this forum, that a 2 ohm tab for a 4 ohm loudspeaker can deliver more current (let's just skip the "naming-discussion" for a second...)
Now, with the possible buy of a ZERO autoformer ahead, I am confronted with this subject anew: I could let any "tab" of the output transformer "see" any load, that the ZEROs are capable of "producing". I think, with my Magnepan I could go from 4 to 16 ohm "visible load" and connect these loads to any of the three output tabs. Just consider the possible combinations - I'd get crazy in testing them all out.
So I was trying to find out beforehand, if there are some sort of rules about matching those two different "impedance values" (again, skip the naming-error...).
Maybe, this explanation will help you to give me some more advice?Joerg
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Question on impedance tabs vs. loudspeaker impedance - jwitzsch 07:09:42 09/16/04 (8)
- Re: Question on impedance tabs vs. loudspeaker impedance - Ron Oehlert 08:36:46 09/16/04 (7)
- What ?!?!? - danlaudionut 11:02:55 09/16/04 (2)
- That all depends - Victor Khomenko 11:36:59 09/16/04 (1)
- Re: That all depends - danlaudionut 11:57:30 09/16/04 (0)
- Re: Question on impedance tabs vs. loudspeaker impedance - undertow@inorbit.com 10:33:16 09/16/04 (3)
- Here ya go - Ron Oehlert 16:30:11 09/17/04 (2)
- Re: Here's another riddle... - robber 05:51:46 09/18/04 (1)
- Re: Here's another riddle...THE 8 ohm is WAY better on my setup now!! - undertow@inorbit.com 08:09:51 09/22/04 (0)