In Reply to: A sampling of nakolawala's posts from harmonicdiscord posted by suits_me on July 31, 2002 at 09:16:59:
I have not listen to many speakers in the past and after reading a lot of post on AA I purchased the VMPS. Initially I thought they were very fine and since they were not broken in I gave it time to settle in. Also I always thought the PR is not tuned properly hence they sound boomy and there is potential for a great spks.
But after months of owning them I am still not able to tune them properly. No matter what I do the spks still sound bass heavy. My comments are not directed toward anybody and these are only my impressions.
Over the past month or so , I got a chance to listen to a couple of spks both floorstanding and monitor spks and I was amazed how good they sounded compared to the RM1s in bass definition and overall sound. This led me to measure the spks and find out if they really had any problems with the design. The other spks measured good and it is reflective of what you hear in real life.
If the measurment dont mean any thing in spk design then why would spks manufactures spend thousand of $$$$ on investing such gear.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: A sampling of nakolawala's posts from harmonicdiscord - nakolawala 09:40:47 07/31/02 (8)
- Re: A sampling of nakolawala's posts from harmonicdiscord - doug s. 14:42:57 08/01/02 (0)
- people who just don't make sense - suits_me 10:14:22 07/31/02 (1)
- I would be interested in buying them... - DFaulds 11:28:59 07/31/02 (0)
- You are comparing apples to oranges... - jonbee 09:54:08 07/31/02 (4)
- there's been five pages or so of such helpful, well-meaning suggest. at HD (nt) - suits_me 10:01:03 08/01/02 (1)
- I mean regarding this very individual/issue (nt) - suits_me 10:05:52 08/01/02 (0)
- Re: You are comparing apples to oranges... - Tyson 10:05:12 07/31/02 (1)
- Another observation - Tyson 12:42:35 07/31/02 (0)