We've seen the tweaks you can do to minimize diffraction effects along the baffle around tweeters by way of felt, neoprene rings, etc. Damping these "diffractive-nasties" is supposed to focus the sound more, the treble, imaging. Treble is supposed to take on less hashy type qualities, sound sweeter.Why don't we see this more in speaker designs? I only see positives in doing this. One could argue the treble might sound too damped, the tonal character of the speaker could change, maybe the voice of speaker would change too much. It doesn't make much sense to me that voicing a speaker by way of factoring in characteristics of baffle diffraction makes much sense. Is it the time consuming task of applying felt to a design versus cost that turns designers off?
I have a pair of Paradox 1's, which I like very much. They are not nearly as hot in the treble as I was led to believe by some owners here at the Asylum. Actully a very accurate but musical tweeter with good equipment. However, due to my personal tastes and my room aberrations, I am going to experiment with applying some felt around the Focal tweeter on the Paradox 1's after having an enlightening experience yesterday. I had applied some thick egg crate acoustic foam around the tweeter, albeit way grossly overboard- but just a fun experiement, and found that the treble took on not only a more focused quality but a very smooth and musical quality as well. So I plan to try some felt for fun to see what happens.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Felt material around tweeters, why not in more speakers? - Sean H 09:53:52 07/29/02 (28)
- Re: Felt material around tweeters, why not in more speakers? - Gordies 14:59:44 07/30/02 (2)
- Re: Felt material around tweeters, why not in more speakers? - layman 22:10:34 07/30/02 (1)
- Re: Felt material around tweeters, why not in more speakers? - Gordies 13:16:13 07/31/02 (0)
- Any Audio Note Speaker owner... - Hardcore 20:20:32 07/29/02 (0)
- Re: Felt material around tweeters, why not in more speakers? - jackman 15:21:10 07/29/02 (0)
- May be redundant - Sam9 14:34:23 07/29/02 (1)
- Re: May be redundant - tecnofossil 18:24:19 07/29/02 (0)
- Re: Felt material around tweeters, why not in more speakers? - botrytis 12:30:31 07/29/02 (0)
- They don't want to pay Dunlavy for his patent? (nt) - Rob Thomas 12:16:00 07/29/02 (1)
- Re: They don't want to pay Dunlavy for his patent? (nt) - tomcat 19:34:39 07/29/02 (0)
- Re: Felting - layman 12:10:56 07/29/02 (8)
- Re: Felting - Sean H 13:11:12 07/29/02 (1)
- Re: page - layman 14:26:36 07/29/02 (0)
- Re: Felting - JeffMO 12:29:57 07/29/02 (5)
- Re: Felting - layman 12:42:02 07/29/02 (4)
- Re: Felting - JeffMO 15:16:41 07/29/02 (3)
- Re: Felting - layman 04:26:35 07/30/02 (2)
- Re: Felting - JeffMO 06:35:34 07/30/02 (1)
- Eureka! - layman 22:16:03 07/30/02 (0)
- Sean: The width and depth of the felt ring makes... - DeKay 11:00:49 07/29/02 (4)
- Re: Sean: The width and depth of the felt ring makes... - Sean H 11:53:46 07/29/02 (3)
- Hi Sean: The top/front of the tweeter dome in the... - DeKay 13:33:13 07/29/02 (1)
- natural fibers - layman 14:33:59 07/29/02 (0)
- Baffle/tweeter interactions - layman 12:24:46 07/29/02 (0)
- Re: Felt material around tweeters, why not in more speakers? - Doug Schneider 10:57:19 07/29/02 (2)
- Re: Felt material around tweeters, why not in more speakers? - Jwm 12:44:55 07/30/02 (1)
- Re: Felt material around tweeters, why not in more speakers? - Doug Schneider 10:54:11 07/31/02 (0)
- Re: Felt material around tweeters, why not in more speakers? - Brad V 10:16:29 07/29/02 (0)