|
Speaker Asylum General speaker questions for audio and home theater. |
|
|
|
Speaker Asylum General speaker questions for audio and home theater. |
|
In Reply to: active studio monitors vs active audiophile speakers posted by john y on June 17, 2002 at 18:12:52:
I did not compare the speakers you are mentioning, except on paper, I just bought the O500C because of their superior performance (specs, measurements, hardware). If you compare the K+H with the Meridian on paper you get way more features and power in the K+H : the 8000 has no EQ, only one linear phase FIR filter. I also mailed Meridian asking for directivity diagrams for their DSP-series and I got none.The K+H has the unique advantage of providing the possibility of changing its sound should you ever not like it. Room influence on sound is a major problem with most hifi speakers. The K+H's high and well controlled directivity makes it substantially non-sensitive to room acoustics. they would not change their sound very much when playing in different rooms.
For more questions mail me off-board.
Klaus (klausrampelmann@hotmail.com)
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: active studio monitors vs active audiophile speakers - Klaus 00:23:37 06/18/02 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
