In Reply to: Re: The case for Maggies posted by dtremit on September 25, 2001 at 17:25:35:
The 12's are a significant step above the MMG's, and I'd say split your 1.5 grand between 12's and an amp rather than between MMG's and an amp. I'd say the 12's are pretty much optimal bang-for-the-buck. I've owned MMG's, 12's and 3.6's.In amplification, you might consider Arcam. They used to make a nice little 50-watt integrated that worked quite well with Maggies - I'm not sure what their lineup includes these days.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- 12's vs MMG's - Duke 23:48:17 09/25/01 (0)