Home Speaker Asylum

General speaker questions for audio and home theater.

RE: I heard the small Giyas before and they didn't seem bright

That B&W sound signature seems to be present in everything they've put out over the last decade or so. They're speakers for people who like a "smile" response.

The Vivids are function over form though. The shape is completely dictated by Dickie's acoustic design objectives, the first of which is that the back wave of every driver has to be absorbed by an exponentially tapered tube. For the bass drivers, that requires a big tube which determines the overall shape of the speaker. Secondly, avoidance of enclosure standing waves and diffraction. And third, dispersion matching.

He's getting better at hiding the tubes though. The Nautilus is one of the fugliest speakers I've ever seen. The Giyas are better, but still hideous. The Oval range was better still. But the smaller Kayas are the first of his Vivid designs that I could maybe own.

I agree with you about show conditions, especially when it comes to bigger speakers in smaller rooms. I've heard some really crap sound from very expensive systems. MBL is tough because they're omnis, so the room contributes more. I really liked one demo I heard with the little 121s though.


This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  Sonic Craft  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?
Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
  Remember my Moniker & Password  (What's this?)    Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:
Message:   (Posts are subject to Content Rules)
Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:  Automagically notify you when someone responds.