In Reply to: ugh posted by villastrangiato on July 14, 2012 at 10:06:05:
Hi,
> If the dimension of the lowest produced frequency can exist well
> within the distance from the source to the listening reference point
> - it HAS to be considered far field.
Nope, the definition used in common acoustic texts is quite precise. It includes wavelength and radiation area for reasons that should be self explanatory.
Of course you make up definitions that suit you and your agenda on the spot (like so much else in this thread), however that does not make them true.
Ciao T
Thor
At 20 bits, you are on the verge of dynamic range covering fly-farts-at-20-feet to intolerable pain. Really, what more could we need?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: ugh - Thorsten 10:46:17 07/14/12 (1)
- double ugh - villastrangiato 11:48:57 07/14/12 (0)