In Reply to: RE: Shill ? posted by jimdgoulding@yahoo.com on April 16, 2012 at 05:46:23:
Miraculously, I actually completely agree with something DJK has posted. Those of us in the trade have to be careful not to cross the line of commercialism when attempting to "help out" others on this site. The rules for manufacturers are pretty explicit and I think in this case may have been broken:"A member of the trade may not volunteer any information about a specific product that he is selling or making, in response to a general request for information about a type of product or in any other discussion.
A trade member may not post announcements, advertisements, sales information or the like about a product he makes or sells."
If the topic introduced was specifically about Jim's stuff, he might have been justified but that doesn't seem to be the case.
Btw Jim, the animated diagram you have demonstrating the effect of diffraction with the use of red colored concentric rings is incorrect. That is not the shape of the resulting waveform when an original wavefront or series of wavefronts encounters a sharp corner of a baffle edge. Some of the images found at the link below are far more accurate. : )http://www.pa.op.dlr.de/acoustics/essay1/beugung_en.html
Edits: 04/16/12
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Shill ? - villastrangiato 05:57:05 04/16/12 (1)
- RE: Shill ? - jimdgoulding@yahoo.com 08:54:11 04/16/12 (0)