In Reply to: RE: Clarifications on Time Coherence posted by RoyJ on March 14, 2012 at 20:20:10:
Man Roy,
You seem to be a nice guy from what I've read. Please, give up while you're ahead!
Roy said - "Let us look one more time at that same vector example-- in which the upper vector was rotated by 180 degrees, to be pointing at a 225-degree angle (45 + 180), and the other remains at 315 degrees-- just as you also wrote."
No Roy, I didn't say that both vectors get advanced when one of the speakers terminals are reversed. I only advanced one of the vectors (from 135 to 315 degrees). Advancing both vectors does nothing and would not be considered the execution of a reverse null in any way, shape or form.
Please, you seem to be regressing with each additional post and I'm beginning to feel embarrassed for you. Let's just agree to disagree, ok? I have cited the documentation by way of published measured data (John Krutke) and the published work of a highly respected corporation (former members of the original Phase Linear Group)to support what I've been saying. The more this is rehashed - the more ridiculous we both look. If anyone has any doubts as to what I've been saying, they don't need to purchase an old AES paper or membership to AES - just review the web links I provided. Have a nice day Roy and go build some boxes!
:)
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Clarifications on Time Coherence - villastrangiato 05:29:47 03/15/12 (1)
- RE: Clarifications on Time Coherence - RoyJ 10:01:05 03/15/12 (0)