In Reply to: fool's bi-amp ? posted by djk on February 21, 2012 at 00:08:01:
DJK:
If you have a 200W/channel amp it does not make sense to get a 2nd 200W/channel amp and bi-amp passively.
However, if you have a parallel crossover network, it can make perfect SENSE to "fools biamp", since you can use a high-damping factor brute amp for your low frequency section and a sweet sounding SET or Class A amp on the mids/highs. The only trick, of course, with two different amps is to be able to gain match.
So in a pro-sound mindset I'd say "fools biamp" is a viable term, but maybe not in audiophile terms.
I've done this sort of bi-amping using SET monoblocks to drive mids/tweets and a more robust amp to drive woofers with really nice results. What it did for me is cut down on how much current I was trying to pull through the 300B SET amps ultimately giving a higher level of overall output. I enjoyed the snappy, speedy and detailed sound of the 300B SETs on the mids/highs and the authoritative, well controlled bass from a brute of an amp on the lows.
I love the mids and highs of single 300B SET amps but the bass leaves a bit to be desired on some types of music. For me, this bi-amp method is a godsend.
Cheers,
Presto
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: fool's bi-amp ? - Presto 14:37:17 02/21/12 (11)
- RE: fool's bi-amp ? - b.l.zeebub 12:14:28 02/23/12 (5)
- RE: fool's bi-amp ? - Presto 15:28:41 02/23/12 (4)
- RE: fool's bi-amp ? - b.l.zeebub 04:44:57 02/25/12 (3)
- RE: fool's bi-amp ? - Presto 16:10:17 02/27/12 (2)
- RE: fool's bi-amp ? - b.l.zeebub 02:26:12 02/28/12 (1)
- RE: fool's bi-amp ? - Presto 17:08:42 02/29/12 (0)
- RE: fool's bi-amp ? - paul 4430 14:47:21 02/22/12 (4)
- RE: fool's bi-amp ? - Presto 17:20:39 02/22/12 (3)
- RE: fool's bi-amp ? - paul 4430 19:24:05 02/22/12 (2)
- Tri-Amping 4430s with Subwoofer - g1inskyms 20:14:29 08/02/14 (0)
- No trouble, my pleasure! -t - Presto 15:29:14 02/23/12 (0)