In Reply to: RE: You could be posted by Hi-Fi Nut on February 11, 2012 at 04:25:41:
Do not know how to spell it better for you.
If you want to discuss controversy about those two specific speakers do so.
General question is meaningless as EACH and ANY, absolutely EACH and ANY, speaker choice is controversial as EACH and ANY speaker is flawed. As a result there is not a speaker that suits all tastes/preferences/spaces.... The only difference between let say B&W "controversy" and let say Monitor audio "controversy" is how much you hear about one or the other.
If one suits your tastes/preferences/spaces... that is one that you should buy and enjoy - buying based on the someone elses t/p/s... or future resale value is idiotic.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite insane."
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- You stil did not get it. - Stale 08:48:16 02/11/12 (7)
- RE: You stil did not get it./ No, it is Y-O-U - Hi-Fi Nut 04:30:53 02/12/12 (1)
- Don't think so - Stale 17:21:41 02/12/12 (0)
- RE: You stil did not get it. - middleground 09:07:46 02/11/12 (0)
- Well put, Stale. (nt) - ChrisVH 08:59:05 02/11/12 (3)
- RE: Well put, Stale. (nt) / no, poorly put and very ""stale"" - Hi-Fi Nut 04:32:14 02/12/12 (2)
- RE: Well put, Stale. (nt) / no, poorly put and very ""stale"" - ChrisVH 06:04:18 02/12/12 (1)
- RE: Well put, Stale. (nt) / no, poorly put and very ""stale"" - Hi-Fi Nut 06:20:05 02/12/12 (0)