In Reply to: I don't think you understand that each speaker is controversial posted by Stale on February 10, 2012 at 14:18:30:
It had nothing to do with that as I don't have the foggiest who you are and where you come from. I simply mean to point out that, to my mind, it takes more to call something a "controversy" than having a bunch of audiophiles disagreeing on what constitutes a good speaker.
I could be wrong...
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: I don't think you understand that each speaker is controversial - middleground 18:05:44 02/10/12 (11)
- You could be - Stale 20:52:28 02/10/12 (10)
- RE: You could be - RC Daniel 22:26:28 02/11/12 (0)
- RE: You could be - Hi-Fi Nut 04:25:41 02/11/12 (8)
- You stil did not get it. - Stale 08:48:16 02/11/12 (7)
- RE: You stil did not get it./ No, it is Y-O-U - Hi-Fi Nut 04:30:53 02/12/12 (1)
- Don't think so - Stale 17:21:41 02/12/12 (0)
- RE: You stil did not get it. - middleground 09:07:46 02/11/12 (0)
- Well put, Stale. (nt) - ChrisVH 08:59:05 02/11/12 (3)
- RE: Well put, Stale. (nt) / no, poorly put and very ""stale"" - Hi-Fi Nut 04:32:14 02/12/12 (2)
- RE: Well put, Stale. (nt) / no, poorly put and very ""stale"" - ChrisVH 06:04:18 02/12/12 (1)
- RE: Well put, Stale. (nt) / no, poorly put and very ""stale"" - Hi-Fi Nut 06:20:05 02/12/12 (0)