As if in cue, Richard Vandersteen's letter to Stereophile in the newest issue makes my point for me. Vanderst, unlike many manufacturers, actually owns, uses and knows the implications of some very expensive, very sophisticated measuring equipment. Again, unlike many loudmouth manufacturers, he backs up is points with solid measurements. RV actually sent in a frequency response curve and a MLSSA waterfall plot. In both cases, RV's results show how wrong Stereophile was and how good the new 2Ce Signatures really are. Stereophile did not contest.My point? Again - most speaker specs are may not be taken as gospel. The lesson here is that if you move the measuring microphone, the specs change. Speaker specs are tricky. Stereophile didn't try to do something bad, they just screwed up. You just can't approach speaker specs with naive faith. It's not like measuring amplifiers.
I was right. I'm always right. Resistance is futile.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Vandersteen Rebuttal To Stereophile - SPL 06:17:03 11/16/00 (14)
- Re: Vandersteen Rebuttal To Stereophile - Minh Tran 06:39:29 11/16/00 (13)
- I've always had a problem with Stereophile's..... - Frank Habrle 13:42:40 11/17/00 (0)
- Re: Vandersteen Rebuttal To Stereophile - Tex 06:56:30 11/16/00 (11)
- Tex, please read - SPL 07:52:49 11/16/00 (0)
- The Truth About Speaker Specs - SPL 07:23:50 11/16/00 (6)
- It's not the sound that counts. - phenderson 15:47:43 11/16/00 (0)
- Re: The Truth About Speaker Specs - Minh Tran 07:52:06 11/16/00 (4)
- Straightforward - SPL 08:56:20 11/16/00 (0)
- Re: The Truth About Speaker Specs - Ozzy 08:45:09 11/16/00 (2)
- Living In A Cardboard Box - SPL 08:58:52 11/16/00 (1)
- Re: Living In A Cardboard Box - Tubegroover 10:17:20 11/16/00 (0)
- Re: Vandersteen Rebuttal To Stereophile - scrooie looie 07:18:29 11/16/00 (2)
- Read Scrooie - He Says It All - SPL 07:26:31 11/16/00 (1)
- Thanks........I reckon - scrooie looie 17:19:25 11/16/00 (0)