I am old enough to remember the sixties when the acoustic suspension sealed box speaker was first introduced by AR. The design had a number of merits:
1) response into the 20 hz range from a medium size speaker
2) a slow rolloff in the bass rather than a sharp hump and falloff
3) measurably much lower harmonic distortion.
4) better bass impulse response - a ported design, according to John Dunlavy, cannot decay more than 3db per cycle. Working out the math, a 60 hz plucked bass guitar note at 90db will take 30 cycles - half a second - to decay. That ought to be audible.
From the early 60s through the 80s the acoustic suspension design was the only choice for makers of quality box speakers. The rivals were large horn designs and transmission line designs a la I.M. Fried.
But in them mid-90s it seems everyone went over to ports. Ported speakers will play 3db louder for equal wattage, and a customer base that listens to rock and heavily electronic music might not notice, or might even enjoy, the gratuitous bass output. It seems the industry press cooperated too: Despite taking many sophisticated measurements, measurements of bass harmonic distortion - once a standard review feature - are rarely seen nowadays. Might the reviewers be protecting someone? What good is a flat bass if much of it is higher harmonics pretending to be bass? Anyway, is there any rational explanation for this changeover or is it just the idea of getting an extra 3db from the amplifier - seemingly a poor rationale for a "high end" company.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Why are ported designs ubiquitous? - Peter 18:19:36 12/22/09 (25)
- Evolution- sometimes 'sideways'... - RoyJ 17:30:22 01/14/10 (0)
- Thanks all for good discussion - now what abt flat panel bass? - Peter 12:26:00 12/25/09 (0)
- RE: now what abt flat panel bass? - Abel McCain 17:06:27 01/09/10 (0)
- Because cabinets are skinny now - Presto 11:18:50 12/23/09 (4)
- Alternative explanation for subjective preference of sealed boxes - Duke 13:13:21 12/23/09 (3)
- The total system Q is a big factor - morricab 04:19:00 01/05/10 (0)
- I believe this is why ported speakers are easier to design - keith_d 18:13:08 12/24/09 (1)
- Easier to meet performance targets perhaps, but the actual design work is more complex - Duke 19:10:02 12/24/09 (0)
- 6th order vented - djk 10:09:27 12/23/09 (1)
- RE: 6th order vented - freddyi 14:06:10 12/23/09 (0)
- True "acoustic suspension" drivers . . . - caspian@peak.org 09:12:18 12/23/09 (0)
- RE: Why are ported designs ubiquitous? - Audioquest4life 08:38:40 12/23/09 (0)
- RE: Why are ported designs ubiquitous? - Tom Brennan 07:53:38 12/23/09 (0)
- RE: Why are ported designs ubiquitous? - keith_d 20:26:18 12/22/09 (1)
- RE: Why are ported designs ubiquitous? - hahax@verizon.net 21:00:27 12/22/09 (0)
- Hi, Rip! Sleep well? - John Marks 19:54:52 12/22/09 (11)
- RE Duntech Sovereigns - goldenthal 01:32:30 01/14/10 (0)
- Some sealed vs vented ramblings - Duke 20:24:54 12/22/09 (10)
- RE: Some sealed vs vented ramblings - hahax@verizon.net 21:12:18 12/22/09 (9)
- RE: Some sealed vs vented ramblings - Duke 21:51:29 12/22/09 (8)
- RE: Some sealed vs vented ramblings - morricab 04:23:24 01/05/10 (0)
- RE: Some sealed vs vented ramblings - hahax@verizon.net 10:55:00 12/23/09 (0)
- RE: Some sealed vs vented ramblings - 3db 04:32:10 12/23/09 (1)
- Obviously I should have been more specific - Duke 08:47:41 12/23/09 (0)
- well told - Ole Lund Christensen 03:37:04 12/23/09 (3)
- RE: well told - hahax@verizon.net 11:00:06 12/23/09 (0)
- RE: well told - Duke 08:50:59 12/23/09 (1)
- RE: well told - loudspeakerguy 11:00:36 01/05/10 (0)
- RE: well told - Jack D II 13:06:35 01/16/10 (0)