In Reply to: I will have my hearing "corrected" then. posted by Bob Neill on May 3, 2007 at 06:43:43:
this has nothing to do with having your hearing corrected but being more balanced and fair. it is true that your original statement didn't make any specific leading comment. but when you consider what you have said in the past and that your leading statement was made directly after audiohobbies' incorrect assumptions based on near field on axis measurements and that he had not ever heard the speakers, you cannot blame jb for bringing it up. the fact is that all merlin speakers were designed with their power response and if used the way they were designed to be used, the top end actually rolls off. again, look at figure 9 of the vsm m review in stereophile. secondly, to assume that all merlins have the same sound, is incorrect. the early versions were designed to be used with softer sounding se triodes and every model from the m to mm/mx and now the mme/mxe sound way more right and bold, even now, with ss. so, to assume a merlin is a merlin is the same thing as saying all chevs are chevs. big difference between a cavalier and a corvette. the last comment about the auditioning older versions could also be made to a few others in this string.
to get a really good indication of what the newer speakers sound like, look at the top of this string at maxwellp's comments of the tsm mme. this man clearly has listened to them and gets it!
bob, you may still not like the newer models but at least give them a chance. take your cat too, he won't run away. my speakers do not chase my cairn terrier out, he actually comes into the room when music is playing.
best regards,
b
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- come on bob... - Bobby Palkovic 09:00:09 05/03/07 (26)
- Re: come on bobby... - theaudiohobby 19:28:05 05/03/07 (4)
- ah, i am sorry that you got offended but - Bobby Palkovic 05:42:59 05/04/07 (3)
- Re: You got me, where - theaudiohobby 06:50:47 05/04/07 (2)
- ah, we should just agree... - Bobby Palkovic 08:24:34 05/04/07 (1)
- Re: ah, we should just agree... - theaudiohobby 10:14:05 05/04/07 (0)
- Re: come on bob... - Bob Neill 09:18:58 05/03/07 (20)
- Re: come on bob... - Bobby Palkovic 09:56:43 05/03/07 (19)
- 200 references to Merlin since a year ago today... - Bob Neill 10:30:51 05/03/07 (8)
- Yes, cuts off at 200 - DRCope 06:20:35 05/05/07 (6)
- These results just in - DRCope 06:35:04 05/05/07 (5)
- You are Some Serious Back-up, man. - Bob Neill 15:52:46 05/05/07 (4)
- If you mean that we have his back, then, yes...we do.! - howard 20:22:34 05/06/07 (1)
- Re: If you mean that we have his back, then, yes...we do.! - Bob Neill 05:56:25 05/07/07 (0)
- dr. cope and bob, i stand... - bobbypalkovic 06:58:51 05/06/07 (0)
- Re: You are Some Serious Back-up, man. - Bobby Palkovic 06:56:48 05/06/07 (0)
- Re: 200 references to Merlin since a year ago today... - Bobby Palkovic 10:39:58 05/03/07 (0)
- Re: come on bob... - Bob Neill 10:13:27 05/03/07 (9)
- Re: come on bob... - Bobby Palkovic 10:51:08 05/03/07 (8)
- Re: come on bob... - Bob Neill 11:10:31 05/03/07 (7)
- Re: come on bob... - jbcortes 03:42:44 05/04/07 (0)
- Re: come on bob... - Bobby Palkovic 11:25:28 05/03/07 (5)
- I have a question for Bob, Bobby and jbcortes - RGA 21:05:54 05/05/07 (4)
- rga, i am packing for the show in... - bobbypalkovic 10:59:20 05/06/07 (0)
- Re: I have a question for Bob, Bobby and jbcortes - Bobby Palkovic 10:57:38 05/06/07 (0)
- Re: I have a question for Bob, Bobby and jbcortes - WEEZ 07:12:03 05/06/07 (1)
- Very good description. - jbcortes 02:11:34 05/08/07 (0)