In Reply to: Re: 4330 posted by Paul L on April 25, 2007 at 14:55:26:
I believe it. The 4330 used during my demo's with the M5s and the S3/5 was the least desireable of all the amps involved. Later I brought other speakers in including a Totem and a the Vandy 1Cs. I was replacing an NAD BEE integrated that in the US costs about 1/2 of what the Creek sells for. Of all the integrateds used the 352 and the 4330 were the least expensive.This was kind of a tough test for the 4330 as I think all of the amps involved were stellar some cost more the twice the price of the 4330 - Stingray, Mambo and Naim included. I ended up chosing Vandersteen 1Cs with the NAD 352.
That all being said your experiences don't surprise me one bit - every situation is going to be different. I'm sure the 4330 shines in many systems - just didn't work out for me.
Give me rhythm or give me death!
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: 4330 - Don T 10:57:06 04/26/07 (0)