Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Extended Frequency Range: Effect on Perceived Speaker Sound - tlyyra 05:22:55 04/19/07 (54)

• Oohashi study - KlausR. 07:17:41 04/21/07 (5)
• Re: did they test the supersonic signal on its own - KlausR. 08:25:49 04/21/07 (4)
• on its own and also intermodulating with LF - tlyyra 13:08:16 04/21/07 (3)
• Re: on its own and also intermodulating with LF - Pat D 15:07:23 04/21/07 (2)
• Kaoru & Shogu - tlyyra 06:56:03 04/22/07 (1)
• Re: Kaoru & Shogu - KlausR. 08:21:15 04/22/07 (0)
• Psychoacoustics... - mkuller 11:04:41 04/19/07 (45)
• Shaky research and logic - Richard BassNut Greene 12:35:09 04/20/07 (8)
• Which part is the shaky research and logic? - tlyyra 15:10:12 04/20/07 (7)
• Re: Which part is the shaky research and logic? - Richard BassNut Greene 07:33:12 04/21/07 (6)
• Re: Which part is the shaky research and logic? - tlyyra 11:42:57 04/21/07 (5)
• How dare you misunderstand my post and then insult me for no reason! - Richard BassNut Greene 07:32:46 04/23/07 (4)
• Re: How dare you misunderstand my post and then insult me for no reason! - tlyyra 10:41:34 04/23/07 (3)
• The air is an excellent ultra-high-frequency absorber -- the data measured at 4 feet from a trumpet are meaningless ... - Richard BassNut Greene 09:22:38 04/24/07 (2)
• The issues, once more - tlyyra 03:04:57 04/25/07 (1)
• I responded to mkuller: "When people add supertweeters, they usually report an increase in sound quality " - Richard BassNut Greene 08:20:59 04/25/07 (0)
• But why? - tlyyra 17:12:27 04/19/07 (35)
• Thanks for the good pointers - tlyyra 11:27:11 04/20/07 (0)
• Try here... - mkuller 19:58:05 04/19/07 (28)
• Dumb Study - Richard BassNut Greene 12:48:01 04/20/07 (27)
• You didn't read it - tlyyra 14:06:59 04/20/07 (24)
• Re: it's frequently cited in serious studies - KlausR. 07:56:30 04/21/07 (8)
• Oohashi - tlyyra 11:28:47 04/21/07 (7)
• Re: Oohashi - Kal Rubinson 15:00:37 04/24/07 (4)
• Not so fast - tlyyra 09:01:10 04/25/07 (3)
• Right: Not so fast - Kal Rubinson 14:07:10 04/25/07 (2)
• Re: Right: Not so fast - tlyyra 16:54:08 04/25/07 (1)
• Re: Right: Not so fast - Kal Rubinson 18:50:12 04/25/07 (0)
• Re: Oohashi - KlausR. 08:30:47 04/22/07 (1)
• Some refs. - tlyyra 13:37:34 04/22/07 (0)
• Didn't have to read much to recognize trash -- and here's why --- - Richard BassNut Greene 07:26:28 04/21/07 (14)
• Re: Didn't have to read much to recognize trash -- and here's why --- - morricab 08:05:11 04/25/07 (1)
• Brain scans are not proxies for what we hear when listening to music - Richard BassNut Greene 08:32:32 04/25/07 (0)
• Re: Didn't have to read much to recognize trash -- and here's why --- - David Aiken 13:53:27 04/21/07 (11)
• Frequencies below 15kHz. mask the audibility of frequencies above 15kHz. assuming they are audible at all - Richard BassNut Greene 07:57:50 04/23/07 (10)
• Re: Frequencies below 15kHz. mask the audibility of frequencies above 15kHz. assuming they are audible at all - David Aiken 14:04:51 04/23/07 (9)
• Where are the data to prove listeners could hear a difference with and w/o the ultra high frequencies? - Richard BassNut Greene 09:38:35 04/24/07 (8)
• Are these biases? - David Aiken 19:00:57 04/24/07 (7)
• They are if the study is to correlate with people visiting this website and the typical music they listen to - Richard BassNut Greene 08:46:36 04/25/07 (4)
• Re: They are if the study is to correlate with people visiting this website and the typical music they listen to - David Aiken 16:37:15 04/26/07 (3)
• Because the study results were used by someone here to support the purchase of supertweeters by someone else here! - Richard BassNut Greene 07:38:53 04/28/07 (1)
• Re: Because the study results were used by someone here to support the purchase of supertweeters by someone else here! - David Aiken 13:31:08 04/28/07 (0)
• Like we used to say in the seminary - tlyyra 01:20:24 04/27/07 (0)
• Re: Are these biases? - morricab 08:01:55 04/25/07 (0)
• Exactly - tlyyra 01:28:16 04/25/07 (0)
• Re: Dumb Post - Sordidman 14:06:03 04/20/07 (1)
• "No one can prove anything" is your brilliant conclusion? - Richard BassNut Greene 07:18:55 04/21/07 (0)
• Re: But why? - Pat D 18:27:19 04/19/07 (3)
• Re : intermodulation - KlausR. 08:33:01 04/21/07 (1)
• Re: Re : intermodulation - Pat D 17:24:28 04/23/07 (0)
• Excellent point from a good source. - Richard BassNut Greene 07:28:15 04/21/07 (0)
• Re: But why? - 20Hz 18:21:53 04/19/07 (0)
• Re: Extended Frequency Range: Effect on Perceived Speaker Sound - Kloss 06:26:54 04/19/07 (1)
• Re: Extended Frequency Range: Effect on Perceived Speaker Sound - tlyyra 17:21:06 04/19/07 (0)

Follow Ups

• But why? - tlyyra 17:12:27 04/19/07 (35)
• Thanks for the good pointers - tlyyra 11:27:11 04/20/07 (0)
• Try here... - mkuller 19:58:05 04/19/07 (28)
• Dumb Study - Richard BassNut Greene 12:48:01 04/20/07 (27)
• You didn't read it - tlyyra 14:06:59 04/20/07 (24)
• Re: it's frequently cited in serious studies - KlausR. 07:56:30 04/21/07 (8)
• Oohashi - tlyyra 11:28:47 04/21/07 (7)
• Re: Oohashi - Kal Rubinson 15:00:37 04/24/07 (4)
• Not so fast - tlyyra 09:01:10 04/25/07 (3)
• Right: Not so fast - Kal Rubinson 14:07:10 04/25/07 (2)
• Re: Right: Not so fast - tlyyra 16:54:08 04/25/07 (1)
• Re: Right: Not so fast - Kal Rubinson 18:50:12 04/25/07 (0)
• Re: Oohashi - KlausR. 08:30:47 04/22/07 (1)
• Some refs. - tlyyra 13:37:34 04/22/07 (0)
• Didn't have to read much to recognize trash -- and here's why --- - Richard BassNut Greene 07:26:28 04/21/07 (14)
• Re: Didn't have to read much to recognize trash -- and here's why --- - morricab 08:05:11 04/25/07 (1)
• Brain scans are not proxies for what we hear when listening to music - Richard BassNut Greene 08:32:32 04/25/07 (0)
• Re: Didn't have to read much to recognize trash -- and here's why --- - David Aiken 13:53:27 04/21/07 (11)
• Frequencies below 15kHz. mask the audibility of frequencies above 15kHz. assuming they are audible at all - Richard BassNut Greene 07:57:50 04/23/07 (10)
• Re: Frequencies below 15kHz. mask the audibility of frequencies above 15kHz. assuming they are audible at all - David Aiken 14:04:51 04/23/07 (9)
• Where are the data to prove listeners could hear a difference with and w/o the ultra high frequencies? - Richard BassNut Greene 09:38:35 04/24/07 (8)
• Are these biases? - David Aiken 19:00:57 04/24/07 (7)
• They are if the study is to correlate with people visiting this website and the typical music they listen to - Richard BassNut Greene 08:46:36 04/25/07 (4)
• Re: They are if the study is to correlate with people visiting this website and the typical music they listen to - David Aiken 16:37:15 04/26/07 (3)
• Because the study results were used by someone here to support the purchase of supertweeters by someone else here! - Richard BassNut Greene 07:38:53 04/28/07 (1)
• Re: Because the study results were used by someone here to support the purchase of supertweeters by someone else here! - David Aiken 13:31:08 04/28/07 (0)
• Like we used to say in the seminary - tlyyra 01:20:24 04/27/07 (0)
• Re: Are these biases? - morricab 08:01:55 04/25/07 (0)
• Exactly - tlyyra 01:28:16 04/25/07 (0)
• Re: Dumb Post - Sordidman 14:06:03 04/20/07 (1)
• "No one can prove anything" is your brilliant conclusion? - Richard BassNut Greene 07:18:55 04/21/07 (0)
• Re: But why? - Pat D 18:27:19 04/19/07 (3)
• Re : intermodulation - KlausR. 08:33:01 04/21/07 (1)
• Re: Re : intermodulation - Pat D 17:24:28 04/23/07 (0)
• Excellent point from a good source. - Richard BassNut Greene 07:28:15 04/21/07 (0)
• Re: But why? - 20Hz 18:21:53 04/19/07 (0)