In Reply to: Re: I'll get a copy of that review... posted by klausDK on March 27, 2007 at 08:15:41:
Well, the same. Amplitude response on axis (flat ±1.5 dB), off-axis (nasties start at about 16 kHz with one narrow-band irregularity at about 2.8 kHz), step-response (almost ideal), waterfall plot (almost empty). Trick is, they use digital x-over and digital equalization.Re: Bruel & Kjaer curve
The curve that you have shown us some time ago and which you apparently like so much is, according to their AES paper, for "recordings which are made as a combination of far-field and near-field information". For recordings under far-field conditions the curve should be "absolutely flat", since then the recording contains a mixture of direct and reflected sound.
Sure, the Pioneer measure much better than the average high-end stuff. I would like to see the vertical off-axis response.
Klaus
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: which measurements - KlausR. 09:53:13 03/27/07 (4)
- The review - KlausR. 05:28:06 03/28/07 (3)
- Re: The review - klausDK 02:41:57 03/30/07 (1)
- Re: The review - KlausR. 07:00:13 03/30/07 (0)
- Re: The review - klausDK 06:45:48 03/28/07 (0)