In Reply to: Time for some quotes posted by Duke on March 10, 2007 at 12:22:59:
Blind tests?
You have none.
Sighted tests?
You have none.
Measurements of a specific sweet spot listening position in a variety of rooms?
You have none.Measurements of a specific sweet spot listening position in ONE room?
You have none.All you have is a variety of "experts" with contradicting subwoofer advice for surround sound audio in print (and no similarities seen in the homes of those who have invited me into their homes).
You cherry pick very general conclusions from experts who do not agree with each other, and then extrapolate them to ALL two-channel audio sweet spot listening positions in ALL rooms?
Don't make me laugh!
This is nothing more than desperate data mining to defend a strong belief about subwoofers ... or to elevate a subwoofer quantity/locations choice that works well in your room into a broad audio rule of thumb for all two-channel audiophiles!
= jumping to conclusions
= baloney
.
.
.
Richard BassNut Greene
Subjective Audiophile 2007
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Quotes can be BS too. Where are the two-channel audio listening tests with real human audiophiles? - Richard BassNut Greene 08:45:46 03/12/07 (6)
- "Quotes can be BS too" is not an argument - Duke 11:03:20 03/12/07 (5)
- You've got "experts" -- I've got "experts" But none of them agree on sub locations (the right answer is "I don't know!") - Richard BassNut Greene 09:14:57 03/13/07 (4)
- My turn to question - Duke 14:02:08 03/13/07 (3)
- I think I have just enough steam left to get in the last word - Richard BassNut Greene 15:10:18 03/13/07 (2)
- Show's over folks. Move along. - Duke 15:23:28 03/13/07 (1)
- They were all snoring after my third post ! - Richard BassNut Greene 08:49:18 03/14/07 (0)