In Reply to: All unproven? posted by Craiger56 on March 7, 2007 at 20:53:43:
I did not say anything about your experience, did I? I stated that all the reasons offered for "why" in the post I was responding to are unproven."The "why" for biwiring is by having the bass and the mid/treble signals run through separate cables, the higher current of the bass will not modulate the lower current mid/treble signal."
Unproven and unlikely. Since they come from the same output stage, all biwiring is doing is moving the shunt across the speaker terminals back to the amp terminals."Also, with the two pairs of connectors on biwirable speakers, the crossover inside the speaker can be more easily optimized to take advantage of the arrangement and thus provide a more open, transparent sound."
Unproven and undemonstrated. How does biwiring result in the optimization of the crossover? In order to accommodate biwiring, some crossover topologies, like series filters, are precluded.Kal
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- ????? - Kal Rubinson 18:32:44 03/08/07 (10)
- Re: ????? - Dave Kingsland 05:08:25 03/09/07 (9)
- Re: ????? - Kal Rubinson 07:37:06 03/09/07 (8)
- Re: ????? - Dave Kingsland 08:50:36 03/09/07 (7)
- Re: ????? - Kal Rubinson 09:26:24 03/09/07 (6)
- Re: ????? - Dave Kingsland 10:43:14 03/09/07 (5)
- Re: ????? - Kal Rubinson 11:30:37 03/09/07 (4)
- Re: ????? - Dave Kingsland 13:25:02 03/09/07 (3)
- Re: ????? - Kal Rubinson 14:08:35 03/09/07 (2)
- Here are some graphs of CALSOD examples - dlr 05:40:47 03/11/07 (0)
- Thank you both for that excellent exchange - Craiger56 16:42:47 03/09/07 (0)