In Reply to: In your opinion only! How about backing off the arrogance a bit? -t posted by Sordidman on February 27, 2007 at 11:16:55:
What sounds best is an individual matter. What performs best *can* be objective if you measure properly. I don't see any indication that would make me think the Accuphase is even close to the NAD, but people should make up their own mind. Sight unseen, sound unheard? I'd go for the NAD based on build quality, design, power, features, flexibility, etc.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Exactly!!! - John Ashman 11:38:23 02/27/07 (5)
- Re: Exactly!!! - morricab 07:26:04 03/01/07 (0)
- Well, even then.... - Sordidman 12:23:11 02/27/07 (0)
- Of course, the best I ever heard B&W 801s sound was on an Accuphase integrated..... - John Ashman 12:07:20 02/27/07 (2)
- Re: Of course, the best I ever heard B&W 801s sound was on an Accuphase integrated..... - rait@ritico.ee 10:00:27 03/01/07 (1)
- Go with whatever is best for you. nt. - George Mann 10:05:05 03/01/07 (0)