In Reply to: Re: Nad M3 or Accuphase E-213 to Dali Helicon 400 speakers posted by George Mann on February 26, 2007 at 13:48:47:
Certainly the NAD is heavier, has twice the power, has dual mono construction and measures better. I mean, I like Accuphase, but I don't see it. The NAD also has a lot of nifty things going for it, like the remote balance/bass/treble/tilt, and stereo high pass crossovers for adding a sub and a bunch of other things. Unless the Accuphase is at least two or three times the price, I don't see how the NAD *wouldn't* be a match for it.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- In what way?!? - John Ashman 16:16:25 02/26/07 (13)
- Re: In what way?!? - George Mann 17:29:53 02/26/07 (12)
- Re: In what way?!? - rait@ritico.ee 02:07:02 02/27/07 (11)
- Re: In what way?!? - George Mann 09:02:41 02/27/07 (10)
- In your opinion only! How about backing off the arrogance a bit? -t - Sordidman 11:16:55 02/27/07 (9)
- My opinion as well as many others! Real world experience, not arrogance! nt. - George Mann 22:25:52 02/27/07 (2)
- And many others disagree, don't assert your opinions as facts -t - Sordidman 10:43:43 03/01/07 (1)
- Where are the people that have heard these 2 units that disagree? - George Mann 11:53:19 03/01/07 (0)
- Exactly!!! - John Ashman 11:38:23 02/27/07 (5)
- Re: Exactly!!! - morricab 07:26:04 03/01/07 (0)
- Well, even then.... - Sordidman 12:23:11 02/27/07 (0)
- Of course, the best I ever heard B&W 801s sound was on an Accuphase integrated..... - John Ashman 12:07:20 02/27/07 (2)
- Re: Of course, the best I ever heard B&W 801s sound was on an Accuphase integrated..... - rait@ritico.ee 10:00:27 03/01/07 (1)
- Go with whatever is best for you. nt. - George Mann 10:05:05 03/01/07 (0)