In Reply to: Sound/build quality of ESS transtatic I? posted by centaurus3200 on February 21, 2007 at 10:48:21:
I had a pair of Transtatic Ones that were sent to Stereophile for review(the review was never done because the Heil speakers came out before the review was written). When I got them home they were the darkest speakers I ever heard which turned out to be because the KEF B110 drivers in both speakers were hooked up to ground(both hot & ground) so there was no mid-range. When this got fixed they were beter but laid back and still not as focused and defined as an IMF Studio(also a transmission line). I finally got lucky and traded them even up for a set of Rogers LS3/5a's.
This was a sort of hodge podge design with a speaker that began as a 'point source' and then switched to a dipole for the tweeter(the electostats shot out the back to a 45 degree reflector panel) and there is no way this sudden change in dispersion characteristics could ever be integrated.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Sound/build quality of ESS transtatic I? - hahax@verizon.net 20:50:52 02/21/07 (6)
- thanks! - this helps a lot - centaurus3200 21:42:37 02/21/07 (5)
- Do you know whose job it was at Electronic Industries - E-Stat 06:08:34 02/22/07 (2)
- i think this was discussed in the past... - centaurus3200 09:43:18 02/22/07 (1)
- I knew the answer - E-Stat 09:49:20 02/22/07 (0)
- Re: thanks! - this helps a lot - ka7niq 21:50:41 02/21/07 (1)
- Re: thanks! - this helps a lot - hahax@verizon.net 21:14:48 02/22/07 (0)