In Reply to: maple platforms: Timbernation or local source posted by mattcecil1@yahoo.com on February 20, 2007 at 10:49:00:
why would a solid mass of sand and lime placed solidly onto any flooring material under a speaker sound terrible? would it sound worse than a sand damped steel box (e.g. 'stands')? it's resonant frequency is damped by the floor! at that point, it's primarily just mass between the floor and speaker-- it's not as if it's a solid concrete floor causing reflections, and i would think would be LESS prone to cause undue resonances than a more porous material, even as dense as maple.PLUS.. if you're taking it to brass tacks-- would that be kiln or air dried maple? apparently, there's distinguishable sonic differences there too.. and last i checked, mapleshade's 2" 'air dried maple' blocks were not what you would call 'cost effective', unless your other options include solid invisible unobtainium speaker levitation devices, or solid gold blocks. i hear those are pretty massive though ... ;).
d
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: maple platforms: Timbernation or local source - stuck.wilson@gmail.com 07:05:59 02/21/07 (4)
- One more thing... - mattcecil1@yahoo.com 08:01:20 02/21/07 (2)
- a hip hip hop hibbbity hop yeah, and y' don't stop.. - stuck.wilson@gmail.com 09:22:00 02/21/07 (1)
- Re: a hip hip hop hibbbity hop yeah, and y' don't stop.. - mattcecil1@yahoo.com 10:33:32 02/21/07 (0)
- Re: maple platforms: Timbernation or local source - mattcecil1@yahoo.com 08:00:32 02/21/07 (0)