In Reply to: So?... posted by drseid on August 3, 2005 at 15:55:19:
check ka7niq's past post concerning Tylers. Nothing out of character here. In a previous post when someone inquired about B&W vs. Tyler he said it was like comparing a Porsche to some contraption built in someone's garage. Even though he admitted he had never heard them! Went into the same rant that B&W had more resources and experience so they must be way better.I pointed out the 50 plus owner reviews (spanning several years) of Tylers at AudioReviews.com. Pointing out that several of the Tyler owners had "upgraded" from more expensive B&W models.
His response was they must be friends of Ty or paid reviews. Shortly after that he even started a thread something along the lines of do you believe the reviews at Audio Review?
Interesting his point about Alberts achievments and resouces MUST somehow equal a superior speaker. Some of his favorite recommended speakers are from manufacturers like Ty that are from speaker companises that are only a blip on the radar in comparison to the resources of companies like VS and B&W. Illogical?
BW Maxx
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Dave nothing unusual for Ka7niq - Maxxc 17:20:56 08/03/05 (6)
- Please Dont Put Words In My Mouth ? - ka7niq 19:07:07 08/03/05 (1)
- No one is putting words in your mouth. - Maxxc 16:54:46 08/04/05 (0)
- Re: That explains a lot... - drseid 17:37:15 08/03/05 (3)
- Here Is An Example Of Value For Money That I Reccommend .... - ka7niq 19:23:07 08/03/05 (2)
- Nice. Says Hales backward. Any conection? nt - free.ranger 19:47:15 08/03/05 (1)
- Re: Nice. Says Hales backward. Any conection? nt - Rick Craig 20:08:39 08/03/05 (0)