In Reply to: It was NOT fair use posted by J on March 23, 2007 at 10:05:17:
So do I. Changes nothing.The notion that moral standards are determined on a case-by-case basis is fascinating and, well, convenient.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- "I object to the harassment of innocent people to achieve this end" - markrohr 10:13:03 03/23/07 (10)
- It's not a case by case basis, - but an aspect of the fair use law -t - Sordidman 12:20:37 03/23/07 (0)
- If you did - J 10:28:44 03/23/07 (8)
- Look, J - markrohr 11:54:24 03/23/07 (7)
- Wrong - J 14:01:13 03/23/07 (6)
- "morality is difficult to define when the law has not done so" - Todd B. 02:15:55 03/25/07 (1)
- Ahh... - J 14:13:45 03/25/07 (0)
- Great post J - Sordidman 20:23:00 03/23/07 (3)
- Here's the thing - J 13:47:03 03/24/07 (2)
- Yep.... - Sordidman 11:08:03 03/26/07 (1)
- Re: Yep.... - J 15:06:42 03/26/07 (0)