In Reply to: Re: Why? posted by Tom Brennan on March 22, 2007 at 00:15:06:
You are arguing which was more working class?
Both left their roots as quickly as they could run.
The Britain they grew up in was drab and boring.
Lennon cut the Rock'N'Roll album which was the closest either got to the music they both grew up loving.
You really seem to be splitting hairs to produce a divergence between them.
Meaningless.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- WOW love your inverted snobbery - dave c 05:14:07 03/22/07 (14)
- Left their roots? Nah ... - SamA 14:57:11 03/22/07 (0)
- Re: WOW love your inverted snobbery - nobody 09:54:38 03/22/07 (1)
- Well, if you mean the most down to earth and least flakey in the face of fame - DAT 12:49:50 03/22/07 (0)
- Re: WOW love your inverted snobbery - Tom Brennan 07:49:13 03/22/07 (10)
- "our versions have done alot less damage to the world than real snobbery and class warfare" - dave c 13:37:12 03/22/07 (3)
- So What's Your Point?? - Todd Krieger 15:17:01 03/22/07 (2)
- who are you talking to? - dave c 19:29:45 03/22/07 (0)
- Indeed - J 15:30:24 03/22/07 (0)
- Off-Topic...... - Todd Krieger 09:24:37 03/22/07 (0)
- You're Mistaking Wealth for Elitism - Todd Krieger 09:02:48 03/22/07 (2)
- Re: The Dixie Chicks music was not political. One statement on the eve of a controversial war was. Even their - LongPlay 01:12:20 03/23/07 (0)
- Re: You're Mistaking Wealth for Elitism - Tom Brennan 09:11:06 03/22/07 (0)
- I'll take John over Paul in New York Minute - Zipcord 08:07:17 03/22/07 (1)
- I don't know. - j_thunders 21:18:01 03/22/07 (0)