In Reply to: For you few posters who got in a snit when I questioned the use posted by Duilawyer on March 14, 2007 at 12:05:35:
The copy he provided (with the caveat that it was snipped) was from the linked review not the Amazon sales copy.So, to your odd post I can say... Huh?
Don't piss on my shoe and tell me it's raining.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Fell for it? He was letting people know the cd was being released and provided a link to a short review of it. - sjb 13:46:27 03/14/07 (5)
- that misses the point I made. reread my post. - Duilawyer 08:02:23 03/15/07 (4)
- But it wasn't. The review he linked to and snipped didn't say what the Amazon copy you posted said. - sjb 08:31:14 03/15/07 (3)
- It did. It was borrowed copy. Or may have been. Enough said. nt - Duilawyer 08:33:05 03/15/07 (2)
- You're too funny. And, absolutely incorrect. - sjb 09:21:42 03/15/07 (1)
- "a VERY disjointed mind ..." That about nails it!...N/T - musetap 10:02:27 03/15/07 (0)