In Reply to: Why is it that Matthew Sweet, as good a pop artist as we've produced, never posted by tinear on March 13, 2007 at 12:14:56:
These artists tend to be one note wonders. Their sound never evolves, never changes. They hit the airwaves with some solid ideas but never expand on them. Both Matthew Sweet and the Smithereens came out of the box with some really good music but after three releases it gets a little bit old.
I'm starting to get the same feeling about the Foo Fighters. I don't think I can take another cd of Dave Grohl's singing....er...screaming.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Why is it that Matthew Sweet, as good a pop artist as we've produced, never - zymurgy 20:50:22 03/13/07 (2)
- Re: Why is it that Matthew Sweet, as good a pop artist as we've produced, never - Todd Krieger 22:06:38 03/21/07 (0)
- Re: Why is it that Matthew Sweet, as good a pop artist as we've produced, never - Boss Tone 13:45:37 03/14/07 (0)