In Reply to: coming back from a cello concert by Ulrike Brand posted by Fernando on August 30, 2000 at 19:48:15:
I think it's interesting that you use KJ's vocal contributions as part of an argument justifying the "blending" of voices with instruments in modern performance. During our KJ discussions, I believe three perspectives dominated:(1) "It's annoying and I wish he'd stop it (since he's a great piano player)" or
(2) "It's distracting, but I can live with it (since he's a great piano player) or
(3) "It doesn't really bother me (since he's a great piano player).
Perspectives that were NOT cited with regard to his gurgling:(1) It ENHANCES his performance
(2) It is part of the musical composition
(3) It is calculated in any way to "blend in" with the musical compositionThe first 3 points, I beleive, would consider that "vocalization" is NOT a legitimate part of modern musical performance...it is something of an unavoidable distraction.
The second 3 points would place vocalizations acceptably (certainly) as part of performance but (questionably) as part of the music composition itself.
Lastly -- and in good humor :-) -- I would never define Keith Jarrett as a "jazz singer"!
Regards,
Steve
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Keith Jarrett's "vocal blend" - SE 07:53:19 08/31/00 (2)
- Re: Glenn Gould - len 21:04:45 08/31/00 (1)
- Re: Humming - René Torenstra 14:12:50 09/04/00 (0)