Jee-zuz!
Fortunately, Dave tells it like it is:The false premise mentioned above stems from the idea that by using "instruments of the period," the interpretation can lay claim to some degree of "authenticity." Daphnis premiered in 1912. There was nothing about orchestral performance in 1912 so different from, say, 1950, or 2000, that it would have superseded the audible differences between orchestras and interpreters from one performance to the next. Nothing. The period instrument crowd can whinge all it likes about vibrato, or string portamento, or small bore brass, or catgut and what have you, but all they are doing is exaggerating the significance of trivial details and exalting mechanism over artistry.I might also note Roth's studied "academician" pose on the booklet cover:
HIPsters getting their claws into this kind of repertoire is the musical equivalent of fake news! Link to the whole review:
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Classics Today reviews a HIP Ravel Daphnis et Chloé - Chris from Lafayette 09:24:08 05/12/17 (31)
- "There was nothing about orchestral performance in 1912 so different from, say, 1950, or 2000, - Timbo in Oz 22:07:09 05/17/17 (0)
- Incidentally, I never heard back from eClassical about the upsampled-to-96/24 download of this recording... - Russell 14:57:10 05/15/17 (1)
- Thanks, Russell - only upsampled 44.1, huh? - Sad! - Chris from Lafayette 17:10:38 05/15/17 (0)
- RE: Classics Today reviews a HIP Ravel Daphnis et Chloé - pbarach 20:42:38 05/13/17 (1)
- Interesting stuff... - Ivan303 22:11:33 05/13/17 (0)
- I guess I'm just lucky... - Ivan303 12:25:56 05/13/17 (3)
- Actually, that's an interesting point with so many recordings available via streaming these days - Chris from Lafayette 18:10:34 05/13/17 (2)
- And thanks to the internet... - Ivan303 07:23:30 05/14/17 (1)
- A dubious advantage! [nt] ;-) - Chris from Lafayette 09:17:51 05/14/17 (0)
- RE: Classics Today reviews a HIP Ravel Daphnis et Chloé - PAR 00:19:08 05/13/17 (12)
- Agreed, not bad at all! (If you love the sound of the intruments; I do.) - jdaniel@jps.net 13:50:01 06/14/17 (0)
- +1 on the Roth Daphnis.... nt - srl1 08:58:30 05/13/17 (3)
- The choir seemed awfully upfront in sample. Nt - jdaniel@jps.net 09:22:36 05/13/17 (2)
- RE: The choir seemed awfully upfront in sample. Nt - PAR 10:37:09 05/13/17 (1)
- Seemed perfectly balanced on both headphones and my main system... - Ivan303 10:37:04 05/14/17 (0)
- No - My opinion is a priori at this point! ;-) - Chris from Lafayette 01:09:57 05/13/17 (6)
- Well, it's DSD... - Ivan303 07:22:45 05/13/17 (1)
- Yes - I guess that's part of the "snake oil"! [nt] ;-) - Chris from Lafayette 09:13:27 05/13/17 (0)
- RE: No - My opinion is a priori at this point! ;-) - PAR 03:14:03 05/13/17 (3)
- Of course I'd like to know about Yuja's fashion statement at RFH - Chris from Lafayette 09:22:08 05/13/17 (1)
- RE: Of course I'd like to know about Yuja's fashion statement at RFH - PAR 10:42:43 05/13/17 (0)
- RE: "a keen follower of fashion"... - Ivan303 07:40:38 05/13/17 (0)
- Grade Inflation - Paul_A 19:00:38 05/12/17 (6)
- I've never liked the famous Monteux. - jdaniel@jps.net 19:06:19 05/12/17 (5)
- I've never even liked Daphnis and Chloe..... - andy evans 21:07:34 05/12/17 (4)
- Part I contains a bit of fly-over country, but still.... - jdaniel@jps.net 06:34:43 05/13/17 (0)
- "I find the content fairly uninteresting" - What? - Chris from Lafayette 00:10:03 05/13/17 (2)
- "Stories about nymphs" with suitable illustrations would work.... (nt) - andy evans 08:52:46 05/13/17 (0)
- I LOVE Daphnes. - oldmkvi 06:41:36 05/13/17 (0)
- RE: Classics Today reviews a HIP Ravel Daphnis et Chloé - jdaniel@jps.net 09:31:58 05/12/17 (1)
- LOL! - Very good! But at least I'm not a lone voice in the wilderness! [nt] ;-) - Chris from Lafayette 12:42:28 05/12/17 (0)