In Reply to: So if the original "digitalization" was DSD 64. . . posted by Chris from Lafayette on May 11, 2017 at 11:13:43:
Still more exciting.
Back to Channel, I thought they recorded the thing in 264.
Not DSD extremist, btw.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Guilty as charged. I assumed that DSD could be edited at this point. Give me Adler at DSD .0001 any day - jdaniel@jps.net 12:07:27 05/11/17 (9)
- If your Sony has these Audio Settings, you'll be - oldmkvi 13:02:43 05/11/17 (8)
- RE: If your Sony has these Audio Settings, you'll be - jdaniel@jps.net 13:38:56 05/11/17 (7)
- RE: "offering Quad DSD when it's really only 64" - Ivan303 16:32:09 05/11/17 (6)
- The current Big Thing with HQ is DSD512. There - oldmkvi 23:03:25 05/11/17 (3)
- I have a DSD 512 capable DAC... - Ivan303 07:04:57 05/12/17 (2)
- RE: I have a DSD 512 capable DAC... - oldmkvi 08:54:01 05/12/17 (1)
- You are correct... - Ivan303 20:55:39 05/12/17 (0)
- Well, in any case, a very impressive recording. If it's on its way, I'd love to hear what you think compared - jdaniel@jps.net 19:17:18 05/11/17 (1)
- If and when I can figure out how to play back 32/352.8k PCM - Ivan303 21:14:46 05/11/17 (0)